Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Sylrae" data-source="post: 4541351" data-attributes="member: 48520">I personally like the idea of using sub-forums to keep things a tad more organized by category.&nbsp; Then this would be the same as the 3.5e house-rules forum would it not? I thought the point of this forum was to come up with a completely revised edition, not just a handful of different mechanics, designed to work with the regular edition. I mean, otherwise, why make a new forum, right?Of course, people aren't going to all agree on ONE revision: (IE, there are some changes I might include that Kerrick wouldn't and vice versa) He said the forum isn't all about project phoenix, which means that he doesnt it to be a system where hes in charge and we make what he wants us to. This approach, will result in (theoretically) multiple 3.75e type systems, which may be closely related, but will have distinctions. (such as how I want to revise clerics, vs. how he wants to do it) granted, a large portion of the modifications ill be using are his creations, either as is, with some adjustment to make it fit my varient, or something we both worked on, but thats why he mentions pathfinder systems and such. It's not so much a forum for a pile of variant rules, we have one of those. It's a forum to come up with a finished 3.75e of some sort(maybe more than one), which, I presume will be available as a pdf. I'm working on one as well, and throwign it into pretty pdf form. It's mostly going to be for private use though, cause a bunch of things im including are not OGL, and I dont own most of the art. Of course, when its done, i'll definitely make a slim version with only stuff i can actually release, but that will be after. Maybe I misunderstood. it's my goal for the time june gets here.&nbsp;-----------The idea of you keeping things on track is a good one. You're definitely qualified for the job.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Sylrae, post: 4541351, member: 48520"] I personally like the idea of using sub-forums to keep things a tad more organized by category. Then this would be the same as the 3.5e house-rules forum would it not? I thought the point of this forum was to come up with a completely revised edition, not just a handful of different mechanics, designed to work with the regular edition. I mean, otherwise, why make a new forum, right? Of course, people aren't going to all agree on ONE revision: (IE, there are some changes I might include that Kerrick wouldn't and vice versa) He said the forum isn't all about project phoenix, which means that he doesnt it to be a system where hes in charge and we make what he wants us to. This approach, will result in (theoretically) multiple 3.75e type systems, which may be closely related, but will have distinctions. (such as how I want to revise clerics, vs. how he wants to do it) granted, a large portion of the modifications ill be using are his creations, either as is, with some adjustment to make it fit my varient, or something we both worked on, but thats why he mentions pathfinder systems and such. It's not so much a forum for a pile of variant rules, we have one of those. It's a forum to come up with a finished 3.75e of some sort(maybe more than one), which, I presume will be available as a pdf. I'm working on one as well, and throwign it into pretty pdf form. It's mostly going to be for private use though, cause a bunch of things im including are not OGL, and I dont own most of the art. Of course, when its done, i'll definitely make a slim version with only stuff i can actually release, but that will be after. Maybe I misunderstood. it's my goal for the time june gets here. -----------The idea of you keeping things on track is a good one. You're definitely qualified for the job. [/QUOTE]

Verification