Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Kerrick" data-source="post: 4542735" data-attributes="member: 4722">I don't know if I can do sub-forums, but threads could work.Exactly. I went about this the wrong way, and apparently people have gotten the wrong impressions. That's mostly my fault. I just want a place where people can discuss their house rules, revisions, and whatnot relating to 3.5. Pathfinder is a revision of the 3.5 system, so mentioning how they do things is a valid approach - say, someone posts a rule for grappling, and I mention that I use the PF grappling system with some modifications and tell them how it might improve their game. I think that's valid discussion. Discussing Pathfinder in general, though, is a bit off-topic - this isn't a Pathfinder forum. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />This approach, will result in (theoretically) multiple 3.75e type systems, which may be closely related, but will have distinctions. (such as how I want to revise clerics, vs. how he wants to do it) granted, a large portion of the modifications ill be using are his creations, either as is, with some adjustment to make it fit my varient, or something we both worked on, but thats why he mentions pathfinder systems and such. Well.... again, you've got the wrong impression. I don't want everyone to work toward a common goal. I noted that a lot of people had mentioned they were working on some version of a 3.75 ruleset, and I thought it'd be a good idea to get them all together, instead of posting bits and pieces on various forums. Maybe someone's looking for a good cleric variant - he can ask here. Someone else wants to share his new armor rules - again, post them here.That's cool, and that's what I'm encouraging - everyone having the ability to work on their own stuff, without any pressure. From what I gather, most folks are doing this for their own groups/homebrew campaign worlds, not to put into publication. Pathfinder, AFAIK, is the only 3.75 ruleset being published. It says "for 3rd edition and older", but it actually does include 3.5. Considering 3.5 and 3E are nearly interchangeable, I see little distinction.Be nice, please.Isn't that what "open exchange of ideas" means? Open Game Content is just that - open. It means that you expect and encourage others to use your material (with proper citation, of course). That's why everything I do is OGC.That's your choice. I'm sorry you feel that way, but some folks care less about getting paid and more about just creating stuff. *shrug* I'm doing this all for free, in my spare time. I could care less about getting paid for it - I do it because it's fun, and it keeps me busy and sane.</blockquote>

Verification