Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The Quest to use the Half-Elf's Dilettante (4e spoilers)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mneme" data-source="post: 4264792" data-attributes="member: 59248"><p><strong>Careful Attack vs Twin Attack</strong></p><p></p><p>I think this is obvous, but it's fun working out the math; Kaydrak is right; under nearly all circumstances, Careful Attack is strictly worse than Twin Attack (exception: melee, when you've got a shield).</p><p></p><p>Look at the numbers:</p><p></p><p>ph: probability of hitting with a basic attack.</p><p></p><p>P(hit): Careful Attack: ph+10% (unless you need > 20 to hit, in which case it's worse).</p><p> Twin Attack: ph*2-ph = 2ph-ph**2 (chance of 1 hit) + (ph**2) (chance of two hits; something that's much better for a ranger than a rogue, of course, as the second hit doesn't count as much for the rogue).</p><p></p><p>So unless 10% is greater than your chance to hit (ie, you need a 20), Twin Attack is better (FWIW, if you need to roll exactly a 20, CA -is- better; it triples your chance of a hit, which is much better than the chance of rolling two crits (or one crit) with TA. And yeah, if you need a 21, CA is still better; it means you still have double the chance to hit, but also crit on a 20, so triple "damage". It's dodgier for a 22 to hit, as going from "hit on a 20" to "crit on a 20" is often not as good as two chances to hit, but not crit on a 20.). Any attack roll above 22, TA is clearly better as it increases your chance to hit where CA doesn't; any attack roll below 19, and TA is clearly better, as it increases your chance to hit -once- more than the 10% that CA gives you. [this doesn't take into account rerolls, but since those are usually encounter powers; not a big deal]. So, for instance, if you need a 15 to hit, with TA, chance to hit at least once is 12/20-36/400, or 51%, with a 9% chance of hitting twice (and better chance of critting, too; 9.75%, with a .25% chance of a double-crit). with CA, chance to hit is 40%, and you've still only got a 5% chance to crit. So in this not-unlikely example, Twin Attack is well over twice as good as Careful Attack is. (yay! Math!)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mneme, post: 4264792, member: 59248"] [b]Careful Attack vs Twin Attack[/b] I think this is obvous, but it's fun working out the math; Kaydrak is right; under nearly all circumstances, Careful Attack is strictly worse than Twin Attack (exception: melee, when you've got a shield). Look at the numbers: ph: probability of hitting with a basic attack. P(hit): Careful Attack: ph+10% (unless you need > 20 to hit, in which case it's worse). Twin Attack: ph*2-ph = 2ph-ph**2 (chance of 1 hit) + (ph**2) (chance of two hits; something that's much better for a ranger than a rogue, of course, as the second hit doesn't count as much for the rogue). So unless 10% is greater than your chance to hit (ie, you need a 20), Twin Attack is better (FWIW, if you need to roll exactly a 20, CA -is- better; it triples your chance of a hit, which is much better than the chance of rolling two crits (or one crit) with TA. And yeah, if you need a 21, CA is still better; it means you still have double the chance to hit, but also crit on a 20, so triple "damage". It's dodgier for a 22 to hit, as going from "hit on a 20" to "crit on a 20" is often not as good as two chances to hit, but not crit on a 20.). Any attack roll above 22, TA is clearly better as it increases your chance to hit where CA doesn't; any attack roll below 19, and TA is clearly better, as it increases your chance to hit -once- more than the 10% that CA gives you. [this doesn't take into account rerolls, but since those are usually encounter powers; not a big deal]. So, for instance, if you need a 15 to hit, with TA, chance to hit at least once is 12/20-36/400, or 51%, with a 9% chance of hitting twice (and better chance of critting, too; 9.75%, with a .25% chance of a double-crit). with CA, chance to hit is 40%, and you've still only got a 5% chance to crit. So in this not-unlikely example, Twin Attack is well over twice as good as Careful Attack is. (yay! Math!) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The Quest to use the Half-Elf's Dilettante (4e spoilers)
Top