Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="JeffB" data-source="post: 325084" data-attributes="member: 518">I voted other...I feel that the "Second Generation" 1E artists were what defined how the game looked (and still does look)for me.Jeff DeeBill WillinghamErol OtusJim RoslofOf course DS and DAT defined the games look, period.As far as the new guys go...It's all hit or miss with me....I think they are all very talented, but the 3E style just doesn't float my boat. I'd have to give my nod to Reynolds though, he often pays homage to the old 1E "look", and I pick up on it. Generally I don't like Sam Woods work at all..but on occasion he puts out something that to me is perfect...the goblin in the MM, The Valley Elf he did in LGJ, that one dragon he did in Monsters of Faerun. Lockwood and Easley are similar to me, in that as long as they are doing Undead, they are excellent, other than that I don't care much for their stuff.For Dragons (and hot chicks <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ) Elmore has everyone beat. I suspect to many on this board he is probably THE D&D artist they grew up with.</blockquote>