Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jerrid Al-Kundo" data-source="post: 261237" data-attributes="member: 3321">Kindly review his posts and find any statement from him that supports this.Surprise.  You find none.What he has indicated is that his aims aren't after a singular focus of power and that obtaining the highest of modifiers aren't a concern.Sorry you have such a hard time reading what he's written.I'm also sorry you have such an easy time typing insultive falsehoods like truly a ROLE-PLAYER.Great is subjective.Every campaign and group has their own measure of what's powerful and what's fitting to a campaign.That's the purpose of a House Rules board, last I checked.Yes, advise was given, but so was his reasoning for doing things the way he did.Which of these fell on deaf ears (or, being a message board, blind eyes)?I don't see that.  A PC multiclassing into Paladin wouldn't be as potent just from the spells.Add in the (incorrect) view that this Paladin is limited to 10 levels; under the new Epic Rules, this isn't the case.Another topic that's been brought up is the dependance of 4 Ability Scores; But isn't there another class that has a dependance on 6 Ability Scores?  Yes, there is.  The Psion.If someone doesn't have the stats, they have their stat increases.  If they don't want to pursue the stats with their increases, then, in SoaPM's campaign, this is a sign of a lack of dedication.  It is part of the sacrifice and earning that a PClass is intended to represent.Again, if you read back to my first posts, I wouldn't use this Paladin because it doesn't fit my campaign.  But I can see it fitting his.  It's fine for you and others not to like his take on the Paladin.  It's not fine for you to tell him he's wrong for not doing it the way you or others would have.Yet, reading this thread, it is indicated several times that he his.</blockquote>

Verification