Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Darrin Drader" data-source="post: 1291455" data-attributes="member: 7394">Well, if you think I was for that war, go read my blog. I talk about all kinds of things that I can't otherwise talk about here. Well, once I add a few more updates anyway. I'd be happy to continue this conversation elsewhere.Good call! <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> I'm all for diversity when it comes about naturally, not when its injected. For example - the cast of The Matrix is good diversity since all the races of mankind were represented in a context that made sense and promoted a positive image of everyone involved (with the notable exception of the French <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />) without promoting typical stereotypes. The crew of Star Trek Voyager is not an example of good diversity, in my opinion, since it seemed to artificially inject it, though the characters were otherwise very much made of cardboard.</blockquote>