Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The ranger is...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Steverooo" data-source="post: 822254" data-attributes="member: 9410"><p>It amazes me when I see people post things like that. The Ranger cannot be duplicated through multiclassing. Not under 3e, anyway. Now if 3.5e gets rewritten such that Ranger and Paladin are again Fighter sub-classes, that would be fine, but it won't happen.</p><p></p><p>1e Rangers and Paladins were "Fighters" in name only. It took more experience to advance as either than a Fighter, and thus the Fighter got multiple attacks before either. With 3e, it takes the same XP to go from level X to Y, regardless of class. Thus, XP required to level was removed as a balancing mechanic.</p><p></p><p>While exceptional STR and CON was given to all PCs (in 1e, only Fighter-types could have better than +1/+1 STR or +2 CON bonuses), and the different Non-Proficiency penalties were dropped (in 1e Fighters were -2, while Magic Users were -5, while in 3e everyone is -4), the Fighter-types got little, in their latest incarnation. The Paladin and Ranger, in particular, got cut. The Ranger's abilities were cut the most, as many of them became unbonused skills for which they had to pay... and without enough skill points to do it.</p><p></p><p>From what we know, 3.5e will be an improvement. Rangers will get six skill points/level. They will get the same feats that everyone gets. But they will get very few Class-defining abilities. There will still be little, besides the skill list, which makes them a Ranger. Unlike the Rogue and Bard, they have no Restricted abilities, save Animal Empathy, shared with Druids. And then there are the Virtual Feats, which almost no one likes, restricting him to one of two choices, instead of allowing choice.</p><p></p><p>None of this will make most of the respondents to this poll happy. It will satisfy almost no one. I would think that pleasing everyone would be a better solution. A Prestige Class will not do that. Many of us will not like being told we have to go through X levels of Y Class to become what we wanted to be, and will go looking for another game to play.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Steverooo, post: 822254, member: 9410"] It amazes me when I see people post things like that. The Ranger cannot be duplicated through multiclassing. Not under 3e, anyway. Now if 3.5e gets rewritten such that Ranger and Paladin are again Fighter sub-classes, that would be fine, but it won't happen. 1e Rangers and Paladins were "Fighters" in name only. It took more experience to advance as either than a Fighter, and thus the Fighter got multiple attacks before either. With 3e, it takes the same XP to go from level X to Y, regardless of class. Thus, XP required to level was removed as a balancing mechanic. While exceptional STR and CON was given to all PCs (in 1e, only Fighter-types could have better than +1/+1 STR or +2 CON bonuses), and the different Non-Proficiency penalties were dropped (in 1e Fighters were -2, while Magic Users were -5, while in 3e everyone is -4), the Fighter-types got little, in their latest incarnation. The Paladin and Ranger, in particular, got cut. The Ranger's abilities were cut the most, as many of them became unbonused skills for which they had to pay... and without enough skill points to do it. From what we know, 3.5e will be an improvement. Rangers will get six skill points/level. They will get the same feats that everyone gets. But they will get very few Class-defining abilities. There will still be little, besides the skill list, which makes them a Ranger. Unlike the Rogue and Bard, they have no Restricted abilities, save Animal Empathy, shared with Druids. And then there are the Virtual Feats, which almost no one likes, restricting him to one of two choices, instead of allowing choice. None of this will make most of the respondents to this poll happy. It will satisfy almost no one. I would think that pleasing everyone would be a better solution. A Prestige Class will not do that. Many of us will not like being told we have to go through X levels of Y Class to become what we wanted to be, and will go looking for another game to play. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The ranger is...
Top