Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="(Psi)SeveredHead" data-source="post: 823349" data-attributes="member: 1165">How can you be a mobile TWF warrior? In order to use TWF you have to use full attacks.I doubt if, unless someone can tell me what is so &quot;wilderness oriented&quot; about holding a short sword in their left hand.1. Someone who is stealthy in outdoor settings<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />2. Someone who excels at tracking<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />3. Someone who uses a bow better than a fighter<img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown&nbsp; &nbsp; :("&nbsp; data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /> Personally, I would take archery feats, but I don't have to be better than the fighter.4. Someone who uses dual-wielding better than a fighter! See my point above about how natural it is to be ambidextrous.5. Someone who has less Hit Points than a fighter? Maybe...6. Someone who has less Armor Class than a fighterPerhaps you should say someone who wears less armor than the fighter <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> After all, you might boost your Dex, wear only minimal armor, and carry a shield. Rangers are proficient with shields, after all.7. Someone who can cast some druid spellsMaybe...So far, I haven't seen anyone disagree with 1 and 2, but this is a very small sample size at the moment. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></blockquote>

[QUOTE="(Psi)SeveredHead, post: 823349, member: 1165"] How can you be a mobile TWF warrior? In order to use TWF you have to use full attacks. I doubt if, unless someone can tell me what is so "wilderness oriented" about holding a short sword in their left hand. 1. Someone who is stealthy in outdoor settings :) 2. Someone who excels at tracking :) 3. Someone who uses a bow better than a fighter :( Personally, I would take archery feats, but I don't [i]have[/i] to be better than the fighter. 4. Someone who uses dual-wielding better than a fighter ! See my point above about how natural it is to be ambidextrous. 5. Someone who has less Hit Points than a fighter ? Maybe... 6. Someone who has less Armor Class than a fighter Perhaps you should say someone who wears less armor than the fighter ;) After all, you might boost your Dex, wear only minimal armor, and carry a shield. Rangers are proficient with shields, after all. 7. Someone who can cast some druid spells Maybe... So far, I haven't seen anyone disagree with 1 and 2, but this is a very small sample size at the moment. ;) [/QUOTE]

Verification