Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Ranger: What is his shtick?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FinalSonicX" data-source="post: 5892440" data-attributes="member: 63787"><p>I think the Ranger using a ranged weapon is really logical - first off it's almost in the ranger's name <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p><p></p><p>Rangers tend to live out in the wilderness and do a lot of stuff out there, so being skilled with a ranged weapon is pretty important for the purposes of hunting and picking off wandering foes without needing an overt direct confrontation. Whether that is a bow or a crossbow or a tomahawk or a rifle (or whatever), I think that the basic idea is tied to the class' core concept. The rangers of Ithilien and Aragorn had bows because they're very practical weapons out in the wilds and rangers are very practical people. Giving the rangers some ranged feats so that it was always a decent option for them would be nice.</p><p></p><p>As for dual-wielding, I agree with you and think that dual-wielding is way too specific of a combat style to basically be designated as the ranger's melee option. Dual-wielding should be an option available to pretty much anyone. When I think "ranger", the only thing that would make me think "dual wielding" is Drizz't and the fact that now there's precedent from prior editions. The real problem with pushing dual-wielding on rangers is that it then makes it generally less desirable to use one-handed or two-handed weapons and then traditional characters who we might associate with rangers feel somewhat out of place (or the class ends up feeling like the wrong fit for the character).</p><p></p><p>I agree with you on several of your other points, though. A ranger's wilderness skills are assets in and of themselves, and I don't think that as a result they need to have fighting skills quite on par with a specialized fighter. They really just need to be able to contribute and hold their own in a fight, at the very least in melee (they need good HP and BAB equivalent).</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FinalSonicX, post: 5892440, member: 63787"] I think the Ranger using a ranged weapon is really logical - first off it's almost in the ranger's name ;) Rangers tend to live out in the wilderness and do a lot of stuff out there, so being skilled with a ranged weapon is pretty important for the purposes of hunting and picking off wandering foes without needing an overt direct confrontation. Whether that is a bow or a crossbow or a tomahawk or a rifle (or whatever), I think that the basic idea is tied to the class' core concept. The rangers of Ithilien and Aragorn had bows because they're very practical weapons out in the wilds and rangers are very practical people. Giving the rangers some ranged feats so that it was always a decent option for them would be nice. As for dual-wielding, I agree with you and think that dual-wielding is way too specific of a combat style to basically be designated as the ranger's melee option. Dual-wielding should be an option available to pretty much anyone. When I think "ranger", the only thing that would make me think "dual wielding" is Drizz't and the fact that now there's precedent from prior editions. The real problem with pushing dual-wielding on rangers is that it then makes it generally less desirable to use one-handed or two-handed weapons and then traditional characters who we might associate with rangers feel somewhat out of place (or the class ends up feeling like the wrong fit for the character). I agree with you on several of your other points, though. A ranger's wilderness skills are assets in and of themselves, and I don't think that as a result they need to have fighting skills quite on par with a specialized fighter. They really just need to be able to contribute and hold their own in a fight, at the very least in melee (they need good HP and BAB equivalent). [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Ranger: What is his shtick?
Top