Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="fumetti" data-source="post: 5431069" data-attributes="member: 6667461">I agree that 4E feels this way.&nbsp; The emphasis on feats and powers feels that character growth is gameplayed via power growth.&nbsp; I liken 4E to Elder Scrolls Oblivion and Morrowind in that regard.Some will argue the opposite, that the many choices of feats and powers&nbsp; is actually an advancement in diversity of character and character&nbsp; growth (but that again is defining the character by its stats).&nbsp; And really, that shouldn't necessarily be the case.Ardent defenders of 4E seem to not see this, or just acknowledge it in their posts.&nbsp; Not sure why.&nbsp; The books and thrust of WOTC seem to support this in every way.Nowhere have I found the 4E rulebooks suggest skipping past any part of conflict, as they have the non-combat activity.If you can equate one's commitment to a game hobby to one's commitment to a marriage, then we live in completely different realities.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="fumetti, post: 5431069, member: 6667461"] I agree that 4E [I]feels [/I]this way. The emphasis on feats and powers [I]feels[/I] that character growth is gameplayed via power growth. I liken 4E to Elder Scrolls Oblivion and Morrowind in that regard. Some will argue the opposite, that the many choices of feats and powers is actually an advancement in diversity of character and character growth (but that again is defining the character by its stats). And really, that shouldn't necessarily be the case. Ardent defenders of 4E seem to not see this, or just acknowledge it in their posts. Not sure why. The books and thrust of WOTC seem to support this in every way. Nowhere have I found the 4E rulebooks suggest skipping past any part of conflict, as they have the non-combat activity. If you can equate one's commitment to a game hobby to one's commitment to a marriage, then we live in completely different realities. [/QUOTE]

Verification