Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Return of House Rules: A Fractured Community
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MThibault" data-source="post: 998805" data-attributes="member: 7971"><p>Having a quick read through (really a skim) of the books last night, I don't think that the sky will fall. I do think that the core-rules will feel less *core* than they have since 3e was released. </p><p></p><p>Where 3.0 felt self-contained and complete (must as 1e did and 2e didn't), 3.5 feels like a different but equal Core Rules. I mean, it is self-contained and it is complete. But just as a DM (or player) could argue that a 1e rule should trump a 2e rule and the premise of the argument seemed sound, a DM (or player) could argue that a 3.0 rule should trump a 3.5 rule and the premise is sound. </p><p></p><p>Of course, the DM makes the final decision. But every dispute of this nature has to be wieghed on its specific and individual merits, because 3.5 doesn't carry the absolute weight of being the precedent, the authority. 2e was a (major) revision of 1e, it was always the child. Even if the parent was very permissive and allowed the child to grow and establish its own identity it was still the pretender to the throne. </p><p></p><p>3e was a cousin that really just took the throne -- not by force, and not without pedigree or justification, but it just walked up and sat down and started to rule. Sure some people worked in facing and weapon speed but it was always clear that they were departing from a 3e baseline and there was little question about altering 2e to include 3e rules (although there was some, most notably the skill system).</p><p></p><p>3.5 is very much the progeny of 3e, and it will take a long time for it to establish its own identity -- if it ever can. Until it does, it will not really carry the weight of authority and there will feel like there are two systems of core rules in circulation.</p><p></p><p>It will happen, of course. By the mid 90s 1e had been out of print long enough for new players and many older players to forget that it ever existed. Years of playing, and it being the first set of rules for a *complete* generation made it its own game. But that took quite a bit of time. 3.0 will eventually fade far enough into the background for it to lose its status as the authoritative precedent and 3.5 will be the undisputed baseline, core rules.</p><p></p><p>Big Hairy Audacious Prediction ahead:</p><p></p><p>At almost the precise moment that 3.5 becomes the baseline, core rules, 4e will be released to wipe the slate clean again and 3.5e will be remembered with the bemused disappointment that the most forgiving people feel for 2e. Not a bad system but not the best, and not the first so you can't really pine for it. When 4e arrives, people will pine for 3e not 3.5, just as when 3e arrived people waxed nostalgic for 1e* not 2e.</p><p></p><p>All in my humble opinion, of course. Who really knows how all this will play out (which I suppose is a mild condemnation of the fundamental business decision, but that's a different issue.) It looks like my personal campaign will use modified 3e rules, though, not modified 3.5 rules.</p><p></p><p>Cheers</p><p></p><p>* Or OD&D in Diaglo's case.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MThibault, post: 998805, member: 7971"] Having a quick read through (really a skim) of the books last night, I don't think that the sky will fall. I do think that the core-rules will feel less *core* than they have since 3e was released. Where 3.0 felt self-contained and complete (must as 1e did and 2e didn't), 3.5 feels like a different but equal Core Rules. I mean, it is self-contained and it is complete. But just as a DM (or player) could argue that a 1e rule should trump a 2e rule and the premise of the argument seemed sound, a DM (or player) could argue that a 3.0 rule should trump a 3.5 rule and the premise is sound. Of course, the DM makes the final decision. But every dispute of this nature has to be wieghed on its specific and individual merits, because 3.5 doesn't carry the absolute weight of being the precedent, the authority. 2e was a (major) revision of 1e, it was always the child. Even if the parent was very permissive and allowed the child to grow and establish its own identity it was still the pretender to the throne. 3e was a cousin that really just took the throne -- not by force, and not without pedigree or justification, but it just walked up and sat down and started to rule. Sure some people worked in facing and weapon speed but it was always clear that they were departing from a 3e baseline and there was little question about altering 2e to include 3e rules (although there was some, most notably the skill system). 3.5 is very much the progeny of 3e, and it will take a long time for it to establish its own identity -- if it ever can. Until it does, it will not really carry the weight of authority and there will feel like there are two systems of core rules in circulation. It will happen, of course. By the mid 90s 1e had been out of print long enough for new players and many older players to forget that it ever existed. Years of playing, and it being the first set of rules for a *complete* generation made it its own game. But that took quite a bit of time. 3.0 will eventually fade far enough into the background for it to lose its status as the authoritative precedent and 3.5 will be the undisputed baseline, core rules. Big Hairy Audacious Prediction ahead: At almost the precise moment that 3.5 becomes the baseline, core rules, 4e will be released to wipe the slate clean again and 3.5e will be remembered with the bemused disappointment that the most forgiving people feel for 2e. Not a bad system but not the best, and not the first so you can't really pine for it. When 4e arrives, people will pine for 3e not 3.5, just as when 3e arrived people waxed nostalgic for 1e* not 2e. All in my humble opinion, of course. Who really knows how all this will play out (which I suppose is a mild condemnation of the fundamental business decision, but that's a different issue.) It looks like my personal campaign will use modified 3e rules, though, not modified 3.5 rules. Cheers * Or OD&D in Diaglo's case. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Return of House Rules: A Fractured Community
Top