Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="dave2008" data-source="post: 8201571" data-attributes="member: 83242">Just to clarify, but 1e and 2e AD&amp;D used the 9 alignment system. D&amp;D (B, BX, BECMI, rules cyclopedia) had the 3 alignment system.I've thought about going to 16 max score for humans to go back to +3 max.&nbsp; We currently use 18 max, so it is no much different.This was also an AD&amp;D thing. We are probably going to go back to something similar in our next 5e campaign. Our current idea is standard HP until lvl 10 and then at 11+ you get the following based on your class HD (with no CON bonus):d6 = 1hpd8 = 2hpd10 = 3hpd12 = 4hpI think if you do this, higher CR monsters in 5e are more effective for most groups.I personally prefer druids as a subclass of clericThere is a moral variant rule in the 5e DMG. But I agree it be nice if it was a line in the stat block, even if it is clearly an optional rule.&nbsp; It makes it clear that is an option.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="dave2008, post: 8201571, member: 83242"] Just to clarify, but 1e and 2e AD&D used the 9 alignment system. D&D (B, BX, BECMI, rules cyclopedia) had the 3 alignment system. I've thought about going to 16 max score for humans to go back to +3 max. We currently use 18 max, so it is no much different. This was also an AD&D thing. We are probably going to go back to something similar in our next 5e campaign. Our current idea is standard HP until lvl 10 and then at 11+ you get the following based on your class HD (with no CON bonus): d6 = 1hp d8 = 2hp d10 = 3hp d12 = 4hp I think if you do this, higher CR monsters in 5e are more effective for most groups. I personally prefer druids as a subclass of cleric There is a moral variant rule in the 5e DMG. But I agree it be nice if it was a line in the stat block, even if it is clearly an optional rule. It makes it clear that is an option. [/QUOTE]

Verification