Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
The
VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX
is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Sandbox and the Railroad
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jacob Lewis" data-source="post: 7470697" data-attributes="member: 6667921"><p>Chris Perkins did an amazing job of skewing perspectives to see things <em>his </em>way. I don't subscribe. There is a lot more to consider than just such simplistic labels which marginalize everything that goes into something as complex as running an RPG. Whether it's a one-shot adventure or a campaigning spanning multiple worlds, there is more to be said about the execution and delivery of a good game experience, not the least important as the reception given from those who participate (i.e. actual players involved in any particular instance). "Sandbox" is not always greater than "railroads" just by virtue of category, and vice versa. As someone else succinctly put it (and beat me to the punch), a sandbox is just a box of dirt, and roller coasters are also railroads. Perspective is everything. But don't misunderstand my point: there are good and bad examples of both, which means neither is superior or inferior to each other. They are simply different styles of play.</p><p></p><p>A "good railroad" is like a roller coaster you want to ride. The ride is predictable, but thrilling when designed to excite the rider. Paizo's Adventure Paths are good examples of this. Their lengthy adventures follow a largely linear progression but typically have enough story depth, theme consistency, and character hooks to keep a group's interest for the entire length of the campaign. Some are more popular than others, and there are some points within that may be dull, but that is no different than how we would rank different roller coasters; some coasters are more exciting than others, and everyone has their favorites.</p><p></p><p>A "bad railroad", on the other hand, could just be a bland adventure module lacking continuity, interest, or otherwise unable to keep the attention of the players who are basically forced to see it through. Usually it is a result from a DM focused on showcasing his personal design or story without any consideration of the player's investment. For example, you're stuck in a tower full of traps and goblins and cannot leave until you clear all 50 rooms, each with a goblin and a random trap. This is a more common mindset of earlier 1st Edition (or OSR) material where the adventure modules were like amusement park rides where you challenge your character creations rather than story-telling. Still, a really good dungeon design or story can still be enjoyable.</p><p></p><p>Sandboxes, on the other hand, work a little differently. It only works if you have players invested in the sandbox to begin with. If you offer them an open map and just ask where to go next, that may be freedom of choice. But without motive, story, or incentive, it's just wandering. Players usually need some direction, unless they've already planned their character's career and story before the game even began. Then they're just fulfilling a fantasy, and the DM is just acting as the chauffeur. </p><p></p><p>A better sandbox has story or motivation which the players can invest, and choices (or the illusion of choices) for players to pick their own path, possibly altering the course of things to come. A sandbox can be any size between a small village with several sites of interest, to an entire world(s) free to explore. Ideally, the size should match the scope of the story, as well as stay within the DMs ability to provide reasonable coverage. Granted, some DMs are more capable of improvising material on the fly than others, but that's simply a matter of knowing your limitations and explaining reasonable expectations with your group.</p><p></p><p>Personally, I think this kind of bias portrayed by Perkins, whether intentional or otherwise, is more harmful than good. "Sandbox" and "railroad" are just two different styles. Knowing what makes good and bad examples of both is more critical to becoming a skillful DM. But how you really know isn't from what a bunch of strangers online say, but how your actual players respond.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jacob Lewis, post: 7470697, member: 6667921"] Chris Perkins did an amazing job of skewing perspectives to see things [I]his [/I]way. I don't subscribe. There is a lot more to consider than just such simplistic labels which marginalize everything that goes into something as complex as running an RPG. Whether it's a one-shot adventure or a campaigning spanning multiple worlds, there is more to be said about the execution and delivery of a good game experience, not the least important as the reception given from those who participate (i.e. actual players involved in any particular instance). "Sandbox" is not always greater than "railroads" just by virtue of category, and vice versa. As someone else succinctly put it (and beat me to the punch), a sandbox is just a box of dirt, and roller coasters are also railroads. Perspective is everything. But don't misunderstand my point: there are good and bad examples of both, which means neither is superior or inferior to each other. They are simply different styles of play. A "good railroad" is like a roller coaster you want to ride. The ride is predictable, but thrilling when designed to excite the rider. Paizo's Adventure Paths are good examples of this. Their lengthy adventures follow a largely linear progression but typically have enough story depth, theme consistency, and character hooks to keep a group's interest for the entire length of the campaign. Some are more popular than others, and there are some points within that may be dull, but that is no different than how we would rank different roller coasters; some coasters are more exciting than others, and everyone has their favorites. A "bad railroad", on the other hand, could just be a bland adventure module lacking continuity, interest, or otherwise unable to keep the attention of the players who are basically forced to see it through. Usually it is a result from a DM focused on showcasing his personal design or story without any consideration of the player's investment. For example, you're stuck in a tower full of traps and goblins and cannot leave until you clear all 50 rooms, each with a goblin and a random trap. This is a more common mindset of earlier 1st Edition (or OSR) material where the adventure modules were like amusement park rides where you challenge your character creations rather than story-telling. Still, a really good dungeon design or story can still be enjoyable. Sandboxes, on the other hand, work a little differently. It only works if you have players invested in the sandbox to begin with. If you offer them an open map and just ask where to go next, that may be freedom of choice. But without motive, story, or incentive, it's just wandering. Players usually need some direction, unless they've already planned their character's career and story before the game even began. Then they're just fulfilling a fantasy, and the DM is just acting as the chauffeur. A better sandbox has story or motivation which the players can invest, and choices (or the illusion of choices) for players to pick their own path, possibly altering the course of things to come. A sandbox can be any size between a small village with several sites of interest, to an entire world(s) free to explore. Ideally, the size should match the scope of the story, as well as stay within the DMs ability to provide reasonable coverage. Granted, some DMs are more capable of improvising material on the fly than others, but that's simply a matter of knowing your limitations and explaining reasonable expectations with your group. Personally, I think this kind of bias portrayed by Perkins, whether intentional or otherwise, is more harmful than good. "Sandbox" and "railroad" are just two different styles. Knowing what makes good and bad examples of both is more critical to becoming a skillful DM. But how you really know isn't from what a bunch of strangers online say, but how your actual players respond. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
The Sandbox and the Railroad
Top