Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mengu" data-source="post: 5399280" data-attributes="member: 65726">Perhaps, the problem is not with the scout, but with the Slayer. I can't quite understand why the "Fighter" gets the more versatile build, while the "Ranger" gets a specialized build. Either way, it could be argued the Scout should get some sort of bonus damage on ranged attacks, but it could be equally argued that the Slayer should not get to apply his weapon talent, his Dex, and his stance (Battle Wrath/Poised Assault) to ranged attacks (all three? really?). Not that they would do this very often, but they can even be a skirmishing archer with Mobile Blade.It's great to be awesome, but out of the box, melee-centric strikers such as Barbarians, Avengers, Monks, don't get to apply their striker feature to ranged attacks, why did the Slayer need an upper hand in awesomeness?</blockquote>