Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jack99" data-source="post: 5115547" data-attributes="member: 53135">I am glad you enjoy it. While the primary purpose of the writeup is for my own reflective process, there is of course a secondary purpose of helping others to know what to do (or what not to do) based on my observations.We didn't play on Tuesday, sadly. 2 were sick, 1 had a family-birthday to attend to and one player had just told me he needed to take a break as work and family are extra demanding atm. Luckily it is not often we have to cancel, but it does happen. Unfortunately it will happen again soon, as I have a 1-week conference in February. I tried to convince my players to drive all the way over to my hotel (a couple of hours) and play, but they didn't bite <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" />Yes, and there is absolutely nothing wrong with the way you run the game. In fact, I agree that it could create some great moments. Unfortunately my players have just acknowledged that they are incapable of not meta-gaming when it comes to how close a character is to death, so the info gets abused if available to all.</blockquote>