Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Next
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
Twitch
YouTube
Facebook (EN Publishing)
Facebook (EN World)
Twitter
Instagram
TikTok
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Shadow in the Flame: A Workshop on Designing Dungeons, Monsters, and a Villain
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 7172797" data-attributes="member: 20323"><p><span style="font-size: 15px"><strong><span style="color: #B22222">Step 6: Dungeon Mapping (part 4 – Mapping in Three Dimensions)</span></strong></span></p><p></p><p>One of the challenges in D&D is evoking dungeons with vertical elements. They can be challenging to describe to players. They often are challenging to map. They can be challenging to write boxed text for. So what makes including vertical design in a dungeon worth the potential headache?</p><p></p><p>In my opinion, many things! Vertical design...</p><ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">...opens up new angles of attack, which can be exciting. A wizard might blow up a turret built into the side of a chasm well to drop the enemies firing from the turret's arrow slit screaming into the chasm below. Ranged attacks might get more play in the dungeon.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">...provides sight lines to PCs of unexplored areas, offering a bit of foreshadowing or enticement to explore. Depending on the PCs' spellcasting abilities this can offer a bit of a challenge, if they see a place but are uncertain how to reach it.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">...reduces the potential for flat dungeons to feel claustrophobic and opens new avenues of movement. The dungeon can do more with ceilings. A fighter might leap off a bridge spanning a chasm, descending from the main dungeon level to a bridge crossing the same chasm on a lower dungeon level. Falling in a pit might lead to a lower level area. Flight, levitation, and climbing might have greater value.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">...offers cover and potential shortcuts, making stealth and overhearing conversations a stronger option than in most flat dungeons.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">...presents a risk of falling (and a use for <em>feather fall</em>, the monk's slow fall, and certain magic items!), and I've found that players love to exploit knocking enemies off things, and just as often are likely to become their own worst enemies (I've seen PC death by falling damage more than any other kind of death).</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">...creates interesting connections between dungeon levels...and potentially within the same dungeon level itself, providing the PCs with more choices for how they might navigate the dungeon.</li> </ul><p></p><p>Here are two hand-drawn maps I've been working on which demonstrate some elements of verticality in different ways.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/6lXjKSC.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>This work-in-progress map depicts a 3-level mezzanine space, a central hub for the dungeon I'm working on. Pretty simple vertical connection using a hole running through the center of the space and spiral staircases on the right. There's also meant to be a pair of winding staircases (to the left) that's supposed to connect the main and upper levels of the gardens, but I realized I may need to revise that due to dimensions...</p><p></p><p><strong>Warning:</strong> I'm about to go into a level of mapping detail that may not appeal to some gamers. So in this Great Garden I have a roughly 20-foot (240") long staircase that's supposed to ascend a total rise of 30 feet (360"). You can see that more clearly in the map below. </p><p></p><p>Stairs in modern carpentry usually have a run of 9" (often more) and a rise of about 8.25". Leaving out the complexities of carpentry like riser heights (thanks to a stone-hewn dungeon)...</p><p></p><p>If I assume each stair has a run of 9", then I divide my total run (240") by 9" and get 26.67 stairs. I'll call it a run of 27 stairs.</p><p></p><p>The rise always is 1 greater than the run. So the rise if 28 stairs</p><p></p><p>But is a total of 28 rises enough to ascend those 30 feet (360")? If I divide 360" by 28, I get a required rise height for each stair of 12.86"! Those would be STEEP stairs indeed, considering the modern standard of 8.25" rise! That reminds me of the challenging stairs from Angkor Wat!</p><p></p><p><img src="http://dpmac.com/angkor/trip-reports/07-08/07-angkorwat/angkorwat-stairs-01.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>So, if I keep those measurements, that's an indicator to me that I should make notation in the adventure about the extreme stairs. These are the kinds of stairs that at least require 2 feet, maybe even 3 feet, of movement to be spent for every 1 foot moved. These are the kinds of stairs that pose a serious risk of taking falling damage if knocked down them. I kind of like that feel for an ancient citadel in the desert.</p><p></p><p><img src="http://i.imgur.com/s3xivYp.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p><p></p><p>This map has a few interesting vertical elements. For starters, in the upper right you can see a crude side profile of the entire dungeon, showing where the upper level in red rests in relation to the other levels.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>watchtower</strong> in the upper left has 3 stories to it connected by an outer perimeter stair. </p><p></p><p>I've included hints of topographic lines to indicate the surface above parts of the dungeon – I could do a better job there.</p><p></p><p>There are two <strong>fumaroles</strong> - the two chasms running top-to-bottom - which provide a connection to the surface and the lower levels of the dungeon. If you look closely at the chasms you'll see penciled-shaded areas; these represent bridges spanning the chasm on lower levels of the dungeon - useful to the DM when describing the area (and to me as a writer when writing boxed text), and if a creature jumps or falls.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>shadow wyvern aerie</strong> (left) is open-air, so that is a potential entry point into the dungeon.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>sorcellment chamber</strong> (left) has a pit in the floor than opens down into the proving grounds, allowing mages to levitate between the two areas.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>wells</strong> (W) are like small stepped wells of the kind found in India, connecting all three levels of the dungeon.</p><p></p><p>The <strong>oculus</strong> (O) areas actually open up to the surface of the ridge the dungeon is hewn into, which suggests how light interacts with the room, and offers a potential point of ingress/egress.</p><p></p><p>[SECTION]<strong>Resources: Verticality in Dungeons</strong></p><p><a href="http://www.critical-hits.com/blog/2011/07/13/the-architect-dm-give-it-some-height/" target="_blank">The Architect DM: Give It Some Height</a></p><p><a href="https://rpgcharacters.wordpress.com/maps/vertical-morphology/" target="_blank">Dyson's Dodecahedron: Vertical Morphology</a></p><p><a href="https://strolen.com/viewing/Sanctum_of_Water" target="_blank">Strolen's Citadel: Sanctum of Water</a>[/SECTION]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 7172797, member: 20323"] [size=4][b][COLOR="#B22222"]Step 6: Dungeon Mapping (part 4 – Mapping in Three Dimensions)[/COLOR][/b][/size] One of the challenges in D&D is evoking dungeons with vertical elements. They can be challenging to describe to players. They often are challenging to map. They can be challenging to write boxed text for. So what makes including vertical design in a dungeon worth the potential headache? In my opinion, many things! Vertical design... [list][*]...opens up new angles of attack, which can be exciting. A wizard might blow up a turret built into the side of a chasm well to drop the enemies firing from the turret's arrow slit screaming into the chasm below. Ranged attacks might get more play in the dungeon. [*]...provides sight lines to PCs of unexplored areas, offering a bit of foreshadowing or enticement to explore. Depending on the PCs' spellcasting abilities this can offer a bit of a challenge, if they see a place but are uncertain how to reach it. [*]...reduces the potential for flat dungeons to feel claustrophobic and opens new avenues of movement. The dungeon can do more with ceilings. A fighter might leap off a bridge spanning a chasm, descending from the main dungeon level to a bridge crossing the same chasm on a lower dungeon level. Falling in a pit might lead to a lower level area. Flight, levitation, and climbing might have greater value. [*]...offers cover and potential shortcuts, making stealth and overhearing conversations a stronger option than in most flat dungeons. [*]...presents a risk of falling (and a use for [I]feather fall[/I], the monk's slow fall, and certain magic items!), and I've found that players love to exploit knocking enemies off things, and just as often are likely to become their own worst enemies (I've seen PC death by falling damage more than any other kind of death). [*]...creates interesting connections between dungeon levels...and potentially within the same dungeon level itself, providing the PCs with more choices for how they might navigate the dungeon.[/list] Here are two hand-drawn maps I've been working on which demonstrate some elements of verticality in different ways. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/6lXjKSC.jpg[/IMG] This work-in-progress map depicts a 3-level mezzanine space, a central hub for the dungeon I'm working on. Pretty simple vertical connection using a hole running through the center of the space and spiral staircases on the right. There's also meant to be a pair of winding staircases (to the left) that's supposed to connect the main and upper levels of the gardens, but I realized I may need to revise that due to dimensions... [B]Warning:[/B] I'm about to go into a level of mapping detail that may not appeal to some gamers. So in this Great Garden I have a roughly 20-foot (240") long staircase that's supposed to ascend a total rise of 30 feet (360"). You can see that more clearly in the map below. Stairs in modern carpentry usually have a run of 9" (often more) and a rise of about 8.25". Leaving out the complexities of carpentry like riser heights (thanks to a stone-hewn dungeon)... If I assume each stair has a run of 9", then I divide my total run (240") by 9" and get 26.67 stairs. I'll call it a run of 27 stairs. The rise always is 1 greater than the run. So the rise if 28 stairs But is a total of 28 rises enough to ascend those 30 feet (360")? If I divide 360" by 28, I get a required rise height for each stair of 12.86"! Those would be STEEP stairs indeed, considering the modern standard of 8.25" rise! That reminds me of the challenging stairs from Angkor Wat! [img]http://dpmac.com/angkor/trip-reports/07-08/07-angkorwat/angkorwat-stairs-01.jpg[/img] So, if I keep those measurements, that's an indicator to me that I should make notation in the adventure about the extreme stairs. These are the kinds of stairs that at least require 2 feet, maybe even 3 feet, of movement to be spent for every 1 foot moved. These are the kinds of stairs that pose a serious risk of taking falling damage if knocked down them. I kind of like that feel for an ancient citadel in the desert. [IMG]http://i.imgur.com/s3xivYp.jpg[/IMG] This map has a few interesting vertical elements. For starters, in the upper right you can see a crude side profile of the entire dungeon, showing where the upper level in red rests in relation to the other levels. The [B]watchtower[/B] in the upper left has 3 stories to it connected by an outer perimeter stair. I've included hints of topographic lines to indicate the surface above parts of the dungeon – I could do a better job there. There are two [B]fumaroles[/B] - the two chasms running top-to-bottom - which provide a connection to the surface and the lower levels of the dungeon. If you look closely at the chasms you'll see penciled-shaded areas; these represent bridges spanning the chasm on lower levels of the dungeon - useful to the DM when describing the area (and to me as a writer when writing boxed text), and if a creature jumps or falls. The [B]shadow wyvern aerie[/B] (left) is open-air, so that is a potential entry point into the dungeon. The [B]sorcellment chamber[/B] (left) has a pit in the floor than opens down into the proving grounds, allowing mages to levitate between the two areas. The [B]wells[/B] (W) are like small stepped wells of the kind found in India, connecting all three levels of the dungeon. The [B]oculus[/B] (O) areas actually open up to the surface of the ridge the dungeon is hewn into, which suggests how light interacts with the room, and offers a potential point of ingress/egress. [SECTION][B]Resources: Verticality in Dungeons[/B] [url=http://www.critical-hits.com/blog/2011/07/13/the-architect-dm-give-it-some-height/]The Architect DM: Give It Some Height[/url] [url=https://rpgcharacters.wordpress.com/maps/vertical-morphology/]Dyson's Dodecahedron: Vertical Morphology[/url] [url=https://strolen.com/viewing/Sanctum_of_Water]Strolen's Citadel: Sanctum of Water[/url][/SECTION] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Shadow in the Flame: A Workshop on Designing Dungeons, Monsters, and a Villain
Top