Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Star Pact Handicap
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Rystil Arden" data-source="post: 4296801" data-attributes="member: 29014"><p>Maybe not 10 Int, but clearly she will not have more than 13 Int if she wants competitive Con and Cha, and, more important by far than the starting stats once you actually start advancing, she won't ever be raising Int except at the mandatory 11 and 21 bumps. The difference between 10 and 13 Int is just a +1 (at Paragon it's a +2, then back to +1 again at Epic). The Cha/Int Star Warlock will have +8 more than than 10 Int (eventually 12 at Epic) Warlock and +7 more than the 13 Int (eventually 15 at Epic) Warlock. Unlike 0 to 1, that's a hugely noticable change. If you aren't going to be raising Int because you're Con/Cha, you almost might as well have 10 (though the 13 can be nice for feat prereqs)--that's where the biggest boosts come from.</p><p></p><p>Yes, you can absolutely play the Con/Cha Star Warlock anyway, (though due to the paucity of actual bonuses for picking Star powers, you were probably better off being one of the other pacts and dipping Star, but not by so much that it's unplayable). And you can play a Str/Wis Cleric with no Charisma. </p><p></p><p>However, it is insulting and blatantly false to ascribe stupidity or inability to understand the 4e ruleset as the motive of the people who have noticed these points and are posting about it here. Everyone knows that you can be bumping up two stats each level--people in this thread don't think that stat raises work like in 3e. But you can't raise <em>three</em> stats per level. So you miss out on quite a bit by raising both Cha and Con, and the other two pacts need not.</p><p></p><p>The solution to the complaints of a 'Star Pact Handicap', of course, is to creatively design a Star Warlock who only uses either Con or Cha, something that there is more than enough design space to do with just the powers in the PH (and it'll be even easier when the Arcane sourcebook comes out). And if you can't or won't do that, the Con/Cha option is out there too.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Rystil Arden, post: 4296801, member: 29014"] Maybe not 10 Int, but clearly she will not have more than 13 Int if she wants competitive Con and Cha, and, more important by far than the starting stats once you actually start advancing, she won't ever be raising Int except at the mandatory 11 and 21 bumps. The difference between 10 and 13 Int is just a +1 (at Paragon it's a +2, then back to +1 again at Epic). The Cha/Int Star Warlock will have +8 more than than 10 Int (eventually 12 at Epic) Warlock and +7 more than the 13 Int (eventually 15 at Epic) Warlock. Unlike 0 to 1, that's a hugely noticable change. If you aren't going to be raising Int because you're Con/Cha, you almost might as well have 10 (though the 13 can be nice for feat prereqs)--that's where the biggest boosts come from. Yes, you can absolutely play the Con/Cha Star Warlock anyway, (though due to the paucity of actual bonuses for picking Star powers, you were probably better off being one of the other pacts and dipping Star, but not by so much that it's unplayable). And you can play a Str/Wis Cleric with no Charisma. However, it is insulting and blatantly false to ascribe stupidity or inability to understand the 4e ruleset as the motive of the people who have noticed these points and are posting about it here. Everyone knows that you can be bumping up two stats each level--people in this thread don't think that stat raises work like in 3e. But you can't raise [i]three[/i] stats per level. So you miss out on quite a bit by raising both Cha and Con, and the other two pacts need not. The solution to the complaints of a 'Star Pact Handicap', of course, is to creatively design a Star Warlock who only uses either Con or Cha, something that there is more than enough design space to do with just the powers in the PH (and it'll be even easier when the Arcane sourcebook comes out). And if you can't or won't do that, the Con/Cha option is out there too. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Star Pact Handicap
Top