Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The "Stop Trying to Impose Your Playstyle" Argument
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7335702" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>So from what I'm gathering, the point of the original post is to say that if someone comes on here and says "X sucks and shouldn't be in the game"... it is a waste of time for someone else to come into the thread and say "Well, then just don't <em>use</em> X."</p><p></p><p>If I'm misinterpreting the point, please correct me.</p><p></p><p>But assuming I'm on point, there are really two different aspects of this that require discussion. The first is when the game already includes X, the second is when the game does not yet have X in it and there's still a possibility that the D&D staff could be convinced NOT to include it in the future.</p><p></p><p>As far as the latter is concerned... that kind of discussion is understandable. You don't want X in the game and there's a chance it still might not be? Sure, there's a discussion there. Hopefully the discussion's argument will actually be about concrete reasons why X might be a good or bad idea, and NOT just "Add X just because!" There's no reason to add things to the game "just because" some people might want it, and WotC has proven over the last 3 years that they AREN'T going to add things "just because" people demand it. So if there are pros and cons to whether X should be in the game... threads talking about the pros and cons are good.</p><p></p><p>But in terms of the <em>former</em>... when X is <strong>already in</strong> D&D... there is absolutely NO REASON NOT TO have people come into the thread and say "Well, then just don't use X." Because <em>there's no discussion otherwise</em>. The game DOES include X. It is IN the game. And it is NOT being removed. Not in future printings, not via errata, not in any other form or fashion.</p><p></p><p>As a result, the fact the thread gets created is itself a pointless waste of time. What exactly is the point of a thread where the originator states "X is stupid shouldn't be in the game!"? When there's absolutely no way to change it? To me, it is merely a "Hey look at me!!!" thread where the person has this compulsive need to tell other people what they don't like.</p><p></p><p>Which is fine, I guess. I mean, if you really have this uncontrollable urge to tell others your own personal dislikes on a message board such as this, that's you prerogative. But if you actually are going to CREATE such a thread... a thread that exists for no other reason for you to rant about what you don't like... then there's absolutely no reason to think you SHOULDN'T receive responses that are essentially telling you to stop being a big whiny baby. Because again... <em>your thread serves no practical purpose.</em> X exists. It's IN the game. And since there's nothing for anyone TO ADD to your thread other than just a bunch of 'A-YUP's! from other people who agree with you... what else are everyone going to say other than stop being a big whiny baby and just not use X.</p><p></p><p>And if you don't WANT to essentially be told that you're being a big whiny baby... then don't create a thread where you're trying to deny reality. You don't HAVE to create a pointless thread like this. Just like we don't HAVE to stay out the thread pointing out how pointless it is.</p><p></p><p>Is us coming into the thread "helpful"? Of course not. But then again... the thread has absolutely nothing to be <em>helped with</em> in the first place.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7335702, member: 7006"] So from what I'm gathering, the point of the original post is to say that if someone comes on here and says "X sucks and shouldn't be in the game"... it is a waste of time for someone else to come into the thread and say "Well, then just don't [I]use[/I] X." If I'm misinterpreting the point, please correct me. But assuming I'm on point, there are really two different aspects of this that require discussion. The first is when the game already includes X, the second is when the game does not yet have X in it and there's still a possibility that the D&D staff could be convinced NOT to include it in the future. As far as the latter is concerned... that kind of discussion is understandable. You don't want X in the game and there's a chance it still might not be? Sure, there's a discussion there. Hopefully the discussion's argument will actually be about concrete reasons why X might be a good or bad idea, and NOT just "Add X just because!" There's no reason to add things to the game "just because" some people might want it, and WotC has proven over the last 3 years that they AREN'T going to add things "just because" people demand it. So if there are pros and cons to whether X should be in the game... threads talking about the pros and cons are good. But in terms of the [I]former[/I]... when X is [B]already in[/B] D&D... there is absolutely NO REASON NOT TO have people come into the thread and say "Well, then just don't use X." Because [I]there's no discussion otherwise[/I]. The game DOES include X. It is IN the game. And it is NOT being removed. Not in future printings, not via errata, not in any other form or fashion. As a result, the fact the thread gets created is itself a pointless waste of time. What exactly is the point of a thread where the originator states "X is stupid shouldn't be in the game!"? When there's absolutely no way to change it? To me, it is merely a "Hey look at me!!!" thread where the person has this compulsive need to tell other people what they don't like. Which is fine, I guess. I mean, if you really have this uncontrollable urge to tell others your own personal dislikes on a message board such as this, that's you prerogative. But if you actually are going to CREATE such a thread... a thread that exists for no other reason for you to rant about what you don't like... then there's absolutely no reason to think you SHOULDN'T receive responses that are essentially telling you to stop being a big whiny baby. Because again... [I]your thread serves no practical purpose.[/I] X exists. It's IN the game. And since there's nothing for anyone TO ADD to your thread other than just a bunch of 'A-YUP's! from other people who agree with you... what else are everyone going to say other than stop being a big whiny baby and just not use X. And if you don't WANT to essentially be told that you're being a big whiny baby... then don't create a thread where you're trying to deny reality. You don't HAVE to create a pointless thread like this. Just like we don't HAVE to stay out the thread pointing out how pointless it is. Is us coming into the thread "helpful"? Of course not. But then again... the thread has absolutely nothing to be [I]helped with[/I] in the first place. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The "Stop Trying to Impose Your Playstyle" Argument
Top