Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The "Stop Trying to Impose Your Playstyle" Argument
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 7335778" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>The one part of "Don't participate in this discussion unless you like X." that I do understand is when someone makes a thread wanting to talk about a certain style of play and finding new and creative ways to make it work, and people show up to say "It already works fine this other way so don't even bother." In those threads, I certainly agree with the OP when they want to say in so many words "If you have nothing to add to the discussion, stop derailing the thread because it has nothing to do with you." Which is true... if someone asks for new ideas for X, then its polite if you're going to jump in to actually respond to the query being asked, and not just to say they're dumb for even asking it.</p><p></p><p>But it doesn't sound like that's what you're referring to either. It sounds like you're talking about someone who creates a thread where they say they hope for X to appear in the future, but then doesn't want anyone to respond to the thread disagreeing with assertion. In that regard, that person really needs to get over themselves. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> This is a discussion about what <em>could</em> appear in a future product, so giving the pros and cons of adding X to the game makes all the sense in the world. Now, we would HOPE that both sides would actually be able to discuss X by giving concrete <em>examples and reasons</em> why their side is the more correct one, because that's how arguments are made and won. And I could therefore understand why one side might get annoyed at the other if the other side wasn't actually giving reasons to support their argument... they were just interrupting and derailing the thread by saying "Nuh uh! You're wrong!" over and over and that's it. At that point, I too would want to doofslap them off the back of the head for being an interrupting idiot who can't support their own argument. Because that kind of attitude just wastes time and energy, making it harder to follow the posts that actually have something to say.</p><p></p><p>Basically, it all boils down to that if you are going to participate in a thread, actually have something meaningful to say. Just don't be a cockblock because you don't like the idea and have nothing better to do with your time than stopping others from talking about it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 7335778, member: 7006"] The one part of "Don't participate in this discussion unless you like X." that I do understand is when someone makes a thread wanting to talk about a certain style of play and finding new and creative ways to make it work, and people show up to say "It already works fine this other way so don't even bother." In those threads, I certainly agree with the OP when they want to say in so many words "If you have nothing to add to the discussion, stop derailing the thread because it has nothing to do with you." Which is true... if someone asks for new ideas for X, then its polite if you're going to jump in to actually respond to the query being asked, and not just to say they're dumb for even asking it. But it doesn't sound like that's what you're referring to either. It sounds like you're talking about someone who creates a thread where they say they hope for X to appear in the future, but then doesn't want anyone to respond to the thread disagreeing with assertion. In that regard, that person really needs to get over themselves. ;) This is a discussion about what [I]could[/I] appear in a future product, so giving the pros and cons of adding X to the game makes all the sense in the world. Now, we would HOPE that both sides would actually be able to discuss X by giving concrete [I]examples and reasons[/I] why their side is the more correct one, because that's how arguments are made and won. And I could therefore understand why one side might get annoyed at the other if the other side wasn't actually giving reasons to support their argument... they were just interrupting and derailing the thread by saying "Nuh uh! You're wrong!" over and over and that's it. At that point, I too would want to doofslap them off the back of the head for being an interrupting idiot who can't support their own argument. Because that kind of attitude just wastes time and energy, making it harder to follow the posts that actually have something to say. Basically, it all boils down to that if you are going to participate in a thread, actually have something meaningful to say. Just don't be a cockblock because you don't like the idea and have nothing better to do with your time than stopping others from talking about it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The "Stop Trying to Impose Your Playstyle" Argument
Top