Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Zaruthustran" data-source="post: 965375" data-attributes="member: 1457">Well said.I was going to offer rebuttals to my replies to my post, but Umbran and others have made the points I was going to make(clever roleplaying does not equal good roleplaying, etc). Then I read Wolfen's reply. I read it again. It still made no sense. It rambles from profit to rules system to stat names to.. who knows.This is the only part that kind of made sense:I think what Wolfen is trying to do is complain about how most DMs run most D&D games. That has nothing to do with his original post (the part where he unsuccessfully argued that "Strong" = "good roleplaying"), but it's a point that might be worthy of discussion in a thread of its own:"Does the D&D ruleset encourage run-and-gun roleplaying?"Oh, wait--that point isn't worthy of discussion because the answer is obviously "yes." Oh well. Wolfen, I have a bit of cliche advice: don't hate the player, hate the game.In good humor,-z</blockquote>