Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Stupid Rule
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="5ekyu" data-source="post: 7283009" data-attributes="member: 6919838"><p>So, I have this rule that has served me well for man years that I call "The Stupid Rule".</p><p></p><p>"If i will feel stupid explaining this (often a rule) to my players in or out of game, then i will not use or change this."</p><p></p><p>Given i play with mixed groups of veteran players, new players, roleplayer, number crunchers etc at various times, it has served me well to help keep the games running smoothly.</p><p></p><p>Now, for the record, "its a genre thing" does not make me feel stupid. chandelier swinging swashbucklers - no problem. </p><p></p><p>But let me give you an example heading forward that is scratching that "stupid rule itch" - the seemingly arbitrary division between ability checks and attack rolls.</p><p></p><p>base in point: HEX (1st level spell) or even Guidance (cantrip) (plus class abilities that allow advantage on checks) all allow an adjustment to ability checks - one a disadvantage the other a bonus d4. but they do not affect attack rolls. Likely plenty more examples.</p><p></p><p>So, for most cases, i can justify this with say "attack roll is quick, short only needing success for an instant thing while ability check is ongoing" and i can cover that something that is a problem or boon to a climb is different than just a quick swing or flurry.</p><p></p><p>But then there's grapple and shove - the attacks that are not attack rolls but ability checks. Now, grapple obviously can fall under "ongoing" for making sense but shove - not so much. </p><p></p><p>the game has attack rolls against ability checks - disarm. So there seems to be flexibility in how things can be done, not exclusively attack rolls and ability checks always separate.</p><p></p><p><strong>It seems the easiest fix would be to change shove into an unarmed attack roll vs ath/acro just like disarm is an attack roll.</strong> this flat out changes which type of things would benefit your shove absolutely and thus just swaps around certain ways to optimize it, but it makes the division between attack roll and ability check a bit clearer and leaves me the general division for "stupid rule" between "attack = quick" and "check = complex" kind of fluff - which for sure is not precisely true but is close enough for private sector.</p><p></p><p>Now, to be clear, i do not have a problem with "but this build combo wont make a good grappler now" or "this combo will now be a good grappler now" and the fact that it switches around your preferred build selections here and there to achieve your goals, but are there other landmines in this approach? it does split shove and grapple into two different types of rolls but at the same time making shove and punch the same type of roll. </p><p></p><p>Any thoughts on impacts of this change, if you have done it, better explanations for the difference between shove and punch that makes guidance work on one but not the other, on the Stupid Rule itself etc are all appreciated.</p><p></p><p>Thanks</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="5ekyu, post: 7283009, member: 6919838"] So, I have this rule that has served me well for man years that I call "The Stupid Rule". "If i will feel stupid explaining this (often a rule) to my players in or out of game, then i will not use or change this." Given i play with mixed groups of veteran players, new players, roleplayer, number crunchers etc at various times, it has served me well to help keep the games running smoothly. Now, for the record, "its a genre thing" does not make me feel stupid. chandelier swinging swashbucklers - no problem. But let me give you an example heading forward that is scratching that "stupid rule itch" - the seemingly arbitrary division between ability checks and attack rolls. base in point: HEX (1st level spell) or even Guidance (cantrip) (plus class abilities that allow advantage on checks) all allow an adjustment to ability checks - one a disadvantage the other a bonus d4. but they do not affect attack rolls. Likely plenty more examples. So, for most cases, i can justify this with say "attack roll is quick, short only needing success for an instant thing while ability check is ongoing" and i can cover that something that is a problem or boon to a climb is different than just a quick swing or flurry. But then there's grapple and shove - the attacks that are not attack rolls but ability checks. Now, grapple obviously can fall under "ongoing" for making sense but shove - not so much. the game has attack rolls against ability checks - disarm. So there seems to be flexibility in how things can be done, not exclusively attack rolls and ability checks always separate. [B]It seems the easiest fix would be to change shove into an unarmed attack roll vs ath/acro just like disarm is an attack roll.[/B] this flat out changes which type of things would benefit your shove absolutely and thus just swaps around certain ways to optimize it, but it makes the division between attack roll and ability check a bit clearer and leaves me the general division for "stupid rule" between "attack = quick" and "check = complex" kind of fluff - which for sure is not precisely true but is close enough for private sector. Now, to be clear, i do not have a problem with "but this build combo wont make a good grappler now" or "this combo will now be a good grappler now" and the fact that it switches around your preferred build selections here and there to achieve your goals, but are there other landmines in this approach? it does split shove and grapple into two different types of rolls but at the same time making shove and punch the same type of roll. Any thoughts on impacts of this change, if you have done it, better explanations for the difference between shove and punch that makes guidance work on one but not the other, on the Stupid Rule itself etc are all appreciated. Thanks [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Stupid Rule
Top