Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DonTadow" data-source="post: 2919499" data-attributes="member: 22622">So we pretty much agree on everything besides batman. Not to get too far off, but what made batman begins suck. I can understand batman 1-4 (one only sucking cause it got the joker wrong) , but it was far more original than the superman regurgitated plot. As for superman, you're reading my mind. It is just silly from a visiaul point of view to pit superman versus lex luthor. Yes, Lex is a great and genious villian, but Superman vs. the evil lex plot just doesnt come off on screen to make superman look..well super. Superman has an impressive, powerful rogue gallery that can truly test him. He also has more weekenses other than kryptonite such as magic and psionics. He comes across as a non-super, stalker whom seems a tad bit dainty.  If superman's rogue gallery isn't popular they should make them popular. Batman used Ra Aghul and the scarecrow. Plus the superman cartoon was just as popular as the batman cartoon, so the public has some familiarity with supes's other villians. The problem is that the the execs whom approve the movies are too afraid to venture outside of the norm with superman. Batman they'd go ahead and wing it.Another problem is with 80 years of comicbook stories, the writers seem to want to write their own stories in the last three movies instead of really try to craft one from the comics.</blockquote>