Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Mustrum_Ridcully" data-source="post: 3016146" data-attributes="member: 710">I didn't find the movie bad. Though I am also not entirely sold, unlike I was with X-Men or Spiderman.I just wonder about the kid: I got the impression (but I am not certain) that he became stronger _near_ Kryptonite, instead of weaker. His direct reactions were to short to be sure, but it might be noticable that he threw the Piano after he was exposed to the Kryptonite and that his asthma didn't show during the encounter with the Kryptonite. It would also make sense - if he really was Supermans son and shared his powers, how could he be so fragile? Unless something is considerably different.Actually, I think it would make sense (and be consistent with what we "see" from Superman) that the psionic aura doesn't work on video or photographic imaging. There will never be a scene where Clark and Superman are in the same picture, so there is little risk that someone happens to compare their looks. If someone has a picture of Clark and Superman, he might get some suspicions, but would probably think more of a bad quality of the photo. Once he meets one of them in person, the psychic aura would probably silence the suspicions again (especially since both pictures wouldn't match up to the percieved Clark/Superman).</blockquote>