Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 2109964" data-attributes="member: 7240">Hong,In your most recent post, you take the following positions:1. That I'm not engaging with other people's arguments and am, instead, "arguing with myself."2. That it's arrogant for me to claim that everyone reading this thread has seen your beer picture when it's only been posted for my benefit.3. That I use too many big words.So help me out here. Try to explain what the substance of your disagreement with me is without directly quoting one of my posts (just the way I've done here). I've taken the position that fluff and crunch are not good terms for discussing published setting material and that there are other, better sets of terminology for doing this. You have taken the position that I am wrong. In what way am I wrong? What is the actual substance of your disagreement with me?EDIT: Thanks for stepping in, Plane Sailing. I'll refrain from rising to the bait further.</blockquote>