Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="fusangite" data-source="post: 2111573" data-attributes="member: 7240">I'm not insulted by it personally. I just don't like the term. You brought up the idea that some people found it derogatory in your last post. So I thought I would follow through what your thinking was on the subject.My objection remains that it suggests that one thing in the document is more substantial than the other. If you're indifferent to the current term and acknowledge that any possible term runs the risk of offending somebody, why are you hostile to the idea of changing the term to one that doesn't imply this lack of substance?Oh, and hong, well done on that last post. I must say that I didn't think you had it in you but my goodness, you've really skewered us with your incisive and witty rejoinder there. I don't know how I'll be able to show my face here again after such a devastating counter-argument.</blockquote>