Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Throne Room
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jack Simth" data-source="post: 4139120" data-attributes="member: 29252"><p>Fundamentally?  You can't.  Seriously.  Unless you can do everything yourself (in which case, you have no need of a kingdom at all), you're going to have people doing things for you because they're things you want done.  If you can't trust them to do the tasks, you can't assign them tasks.  </p><p></p><p>Consider a war.  The king is in his throne room.  He has to trust his scouts to give honest reports of enemy movements.  He has to trust his generals/lieutenants to train his armies.  He has to trust that those troops he inspected aren't actually a troupe of actors hired for the inspection while the "general" takes the army budget and buys a tropical island to retire on.  He has to trust that the weapons he inspected are actually a representative sample of the worksmanship of the smith he's hiring to equip his army.  He has to trust that the cooks he hired are buying food from sources that don't poison them.</p><p></p><p>At best, you can minimize the effects of individual betrayals, or raise the costs of betrayal so that individual betrayals are unlikely.  If one judge is making unreasonable rulings, the attorney can bring it to your attention, and you can replace the one judge; he will be removed, and serve as an example that abuse of your position or incompetency in it leads to losing it.  If one general is giving funny orders, the other generals will see it, report it, and the same thing happens.  If one scout is dishonest, his story won't match up with the ones from the other scouts, and so on.  If all your guards are equipped with reach weapons, they have to step out of position before they actually threaten you - stepping out of proper place is going to be a giveaway that something wrong, so the other guards have a chance to react.  If they sneak a short-range weapon in, then when you've got two guards with reach weapons adjacent to you, they're threatening each other.  There's nothing quite like knowing that if you kill your leige, you won't outlive him by more than six seconds to keep the maybe-disloyal guard in line.</p><p></p><p>If you face a sizable conspiracy of people you trust, you've already lost.  You cannot rule without trusting a sizable number of people.</p><p></p><p>There's a reason the sword was hanging by a thread over the head of he who wanted to know what it was like to be king in the old tale.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jack Simth, post: 4139120, member: 29252"] Fundamentally? You can't. Seriously. Unless you can do everything yourself (in which case, you have no need of a kingdom at all), you're going to have people doing things for you because they're things you want done. If you can't trust them to do the tasks, you can't assign them tasks. Consider a war. The king is in his throne room. He has to trust his scouts to give honest reports of enemy movements. He has to trust his generals/lieutenants to train his armies. He has to trust that those troops he inspected aren't actually a troupe of actors hired for the inspection while the "general" takes the army budget and buys a tropical island to retire on. He has to trust that the weapons he inspected are actually a representative sample of the worksmanship of the smith he's hiring to equip his army. He has to trust that the cooks he hired are buying food from sources that don't poison them. At best, you can minimize the effects of individual betrayals, or raise the costs of betrayal so that individual betrayals are unlikely. If one judge is making unreasonable rulings, the attorney can bring it to your attention, and you can replace the one judge; he will be removed, and serve as an example that abuse of your position or incompetency in it leads to losing it. If one general is giving funny orders, the other generals will see it, report it, and the same thing happens. If one scout is dishonest, his story won't match up with the ones from the other scouts, and so on. If all your guards are equipped with reach weapons, they have to step out of position before they actually threaten you - stepping out of proper place is going to be a giveaway that something wrong, so the other guards have a chance to react. If they sneak a short-range weapon in, then when you've got two guards with reach weapons adjacent to you, they're threatening each other. There's nothing quite like knowing that if you kill your leige, you won't outlive him by more than six seconds to keep the maybe-disloyal guard in line. If you face a sizable conspiracy of people you trust, you've already lost. You cannot rule without trusting a sizable number of people. There's a reason the sword was hanging by a thread over the head of he who wanted to know what it was like to be king in the old tale. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
The Throne Room
Top