Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BryonD" data-source="post: 3955551" data-attributes="member: 957">Its just using a term that, according to the initial story, started within the halls of WotC.I got raked over the coals for being overly reactive when I used the same term a few weeks ago.&nbsp; But that wasn't an accurate reading at all.&nbsp; If WotC makes a proactive choice that they are going to change some things knowing full well that a certain segment of their existing customer base will be alienated but they expect to have a net growth in customers for it, then they are absolutely in the rights to do so.&nbsp; And, if they truly believe it will grow sales, they aren't just in their rights, it is something they really SHOULD do.&nbsp; I still may be one of the ones that gets &quot;fired&quot;*.&nbsp; If so, fine.&nbsp; I may not be glad, but there doesn't need to be any animosity about it.* - Though I loved this comic and it was a grain of salt back on the plus side.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BryonD, post: 3955551, member: 957"] Its just using a term that, according to the initial story, started within the halls of WotC. I got raked over the coals for being overly reactive when I used the same term a few weeks ago. But that wasn't an accurate reading at all. If WotC makes a proactive choice that they are going to change some things knowing full well that a certain segment of their existing customer base will be alienated but they expect to have a net growth in customers for it, then they are absolutely in the rights to do so. And, if they truly believe it will grow sales, they aren't just in their rights, it is something they really SHOULD do. I still may be one of the ones that gets "fired"*. If so, fine. I may not be glad, but there doesn't need to be any animosity about it. * - Though I loved this comic and it was a grain of salt back on the plus side. [/QUOTE]

Verification