Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jack7" data-source="post: 4806921" data-attributes="member: 54707">When I have the time Merc I'm gonna hav'ta come back to this response and study it in detail. This jumped out at me though, and although it was a semantic matter, the way I phrased it, I do agree with what you're driving at.I wanted to imply stimulation from without (the trigger), but that trigger would then act in such a way (as compared to other possible methods) that the imagination would become so "inspired" that it no longer needed the original trigger to continue on becoming ever "more and more inspired and self-active." If you get what I'm saying. To use a sort of crude military analogy, I'm talking about "fire and forget" triggers.  Once fired you don't have to worry about it anymore, it becomes "self-acting and it continues on without further outside action on your part."Anyways I'm gonna come back to what you said and study it in more detail later today. Very interesting speculations and thoughts.I'll get to other people's responses too when I'm a little less pushed for time.</blockquote>