Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="TiQuinn" data-source="post: 9490195" data-attributes="member: 4871">I have the player’s version of events. I don’t have to argue for someone who isn’t in this thread. If you want to, go ahead.Then by all means, do so. You can do it without challenging my opinion. You haven’t actually presented a different POV, you’ve simply disagreed with mine and supposed the DM must have had a good reason. So go ahead. What’s that good reason?Do you know the rules of AD&amp;D 2nd Edition? I believe you are misinterpreting this statement entirely.I don’t think you understand what the “No True Scotsman” fallacy is if you believe those statements are indicative of it.Increasingly, I don’t think you understand the rules of the edition they were playing.I believe my opinion is well-founded because I have experience with the game as both a DM and a player, have encountered DMs who have treated magic items as something to give out but then restrict usage of, and I have also encountered DMs who were much less restrictive in this regard, so I’ve seen the difference in game play. All this with 2nd edition AD&amp;D.If you have a different opinion, once again, instead of simply attacking mine, feel free to present your opinion of how the DM could’ve been justified. It will be equally valid as my opinion. I’ve yet to actually see that from you.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="TiQuinn, post: 9490195, member: 4871"] I have the player’s version of events. I don’t have to argue for someone who isn’t in this thread. If you want to, go ahead. Then by all means, do so. You can do it without challenging my opinion. You haven’t actually presented a different POV, you’ve simply disagreed with mine and supposed the DM must have had a good reason. So go ahead. What’s that good reason? Do you know the rules of AD&D 2nd Edition? I believe you are misinterpreting this statement entirely. I don’t think you understand what the “No True Scotsman” fallacy is if you believe those statements are indicative of it. Increasingly, I don’t think you understand the rules of the edition they were playing. I believe my opinion is well-founded because I have experience with the game as both a DM and a player, have encountered DMs who have treated magic items as something to give out but then restrict usage of, and I have also encountered DMs who were much less restrictive in this regard, so I’ve seen the difference in game play. All this with 2nd edition AD&D. If you have a different opinion, once again, instead of simply attacking mine, feel free to present your opinion of how the DM could’ve been justified. It will be equally valid as my opinion. I’ve yet to actually see that from you. [/QUOTE]

Verification