Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WayneLigon" data-source="post: 3122581" data-attributes="member: 3649"><p>What you have here is basically an unanswerable question, much like 'what is love' or 'why do people do evil'. </p><p></p><p>I'm sure you can find other places that discuss the notions that 'everything and everyone is of equal value', but that strays too far into politics for here</p><p></p><p>I think there is a <em>degree </em> of quality that can be held up to most works, but I also think that not every work can use the same scale. Comparing a TV show with a deep and moving personal account novel is just not done; you're comparing apples and oranges.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It isn't. There are only twists and turns on anywhere from 10 to about 35 plots (depending on the source you read). The nature and quality of those twists and turns are the important parts. Offering new insights into human nature. Showing emotion, command of language, ability to create imagery and dialog, unique characters.. those are the things that get hung on the bare tree of plot.</p><p></p><p>Dismissing a work simply because it's 'youth comes from nothing and grows into great power', simply on the strength of it <em>being </em> that very plot, is foolish. It demonstrates a deep and abiding foolishness - a lack of good judgement. It's very much akin to people who say 'I could tell how things were going to turn out in the first five minutes, so I turned it off' or 'I figured out the plot on the first page'. </p><p></p><p>In the general sense of things, this simply is not possible. When a person says this to me I hear "My desire for instant gratification did not allow me to put in the time needed to understand and appreciate all the other elements of the work". There could be amazing images, witty and insightful dialog, and this person will never, ever know that because he read the back jacket cover (like as not written in about fifteen minutes by some intern based on what his boss told him the book was about) and made a snap decision. </p><p></p><p>It's much like the people who feel the need to list out plot points and then disparagingly say 'check' after every one, as if they were saying or doing something clever or insightful instead. </p><p></p><p>Unfortunately, sometimes you <em>can </em> do just that: TV has created endless utterly predictable scripts for very specific reasons - only a few exceptional shows deviate from formula. It's trained a lot of people that if they see X then they can logically expect Y because they've seen it over and over again. It's dulled them to nuance and instilled an expectation that other forms of media are exactly the same (and some have become like that, for the same specific reason: they want people to be comfortable and so purposefully do nothing to 'rock the boat'.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WayneLigon, post: 3122581, member: 3649"] What you have here is basically an unanswerable question, much like 'what is love' or 'why do people do evil'. I'm sure you can find other places that discuss the notions that 'everything and everyone is of equal value', but that strays too far into politics for here I think there is a [I]degree [/I] of quality that can be held up to most works, but I also think that not every work can use the same scale. Comparing a TV show with a deep and moving personal account novel is just not done; you're comparing apples and oranges. It isn't. There are only twists and turns on anywhere from 10 to about 35 plots (depending on the source you read). The nature and quality of those twists and turns are the important parts. Offering new insights into human nature. Showing emotion, command of language, ability to create imagery and dialog, unique characters.. those are the things that get hung on the bare tree of plot. Dismissing a work simply because it's 'youth comes from nothing and grows into great power', simply on the strength of it [I]being [/I] that very plot, is foolish. It demonstrates a deep and abiding foolishness - a lack of good judgement. It's very much akin to people who say 'I could tell how things were going to turn out in the first five minutes, so I turned it off' or 'I figured out the plot on the first page'. In the general sense of things, this simply is not possible. When a person says this to me I hear "My desire for instant gratification did not allow me to put in the time needed to understand and appreciate all the other elements of the work". There could be amazing images, witty and insightful dialog, and this person will never, ever know that because he read the back jacket cover (like as not written in about fifteen minutes by some intern based on what his boss told him the book was about) and made a snap decision. It's much like the people who feel the need to list out plot points and then disparagingly say 'check' after every one, as if they were saying or doing something clever or insightful instead. Unfortunately, sometimes you [I]can [/I] do just that: TV has created endless utterly predictable scripts for very specific reasons - only a few exceptional shows deviate from formula. It's trained a lot of people that if they see X then they can logically expect Y because they've seen it over and over again. It's dulled them to nuance and instilled an expectation that other forms of media are exactly the same (and some have become like that, for the same specific reason: they want people to be comfortable and so purposefully do nothing to 'rock the boat'.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
Top