Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Merlion" data-source="post: 3124631" data-attributes="member: 10397"><p>This is the part I'm not so sure about. I still see their being to much disagreement among both regular readers and so called "experts" for their to be some final, absolute objective scale. For instance the "expert" you quoated who while certainly mentioning Eragon's flaws, also called it a good work in the end. You disagree. So which of you is right?</p><p></p><p>Then theres the issue of all the books, such as Eragon, that so many many people enjoy so well and become so successful, and yet people want to claim are "bad". Now maybe this explains that..</p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>However, I have trouble with this notion so many of you have of enjoyment being a seperate entity from quality. If you enjoyed it, as far as I'm concerned it was good.</p><p></p><p>Maybe not as well crafted as other works (yes, some things can be accepted as "better than" others by a majority, although that still has a subjective element), but my point is if you enjoyed it, it still has *value*</p><p></p><p>And again, there is that issue of purpose. What was the purpose of Eragon (for example)? Well I cant be totally sure not having created it or spoken to the one that did, but from what I've read I'd say that in that case at least, it was mainly intended to entertain, and to be enjoyed. And in that, it has succeeded for thousands (myself included so far).</p><p></p><p>Is it writen as well as the Lord of the Rings? No, its not.</p><p></p><p>Is it objectively awful? No, its not that either. At worst, its at the low end of the spectrum of that semi-objective scale of the general criteria of the craft of writting. And for the record, although I have no "credentials" beyond having read a great deal of fantasy fiction in my life, and having tried to develop my own writing skills for the past couple of years, I feel that certain aspects of the story were (or I should say are so far) quite well crafted. </p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree with your overall point. However, I have never personally read a book, or experienced any artistic work that was totally lacking in craft in all points of the general criteria of its medium.</p><p></p><p>I come back to Lovecraft again. He's not real great at dialogue or characterization sure. But he's an ace on mood, theme, description and various other areas. </p><p></p><p>Also note that while I am willing to agree that say for instance the kid that wrote Eragon is not, at this moment, as good a writer as Tolkien or Lovecraft or Stephen King, in any area, I think theres every chance he *could* be with additional practice. </p><p></p><p></p><p>See I'm a very positive person. I believe very strongly in the potential of all things and people. Of course I also realize that statement will now be ripped to shreds, but oh well.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Merlion, post: 3124631, member: 10397"] This is the part I'm not so sure about. I still see their being to much disagreement among both regular readers and so called "experts" for their to be some final, absolute objective scale. For instance the "expert" you quoated who while certainly mentioning Eragon's flaws, also called it a good work in the end. You disagree. So which of you is right? Then theres the issue of all the books, such as Eragon, that so many many people enjoy so well and become so successful, and yet people want to claim are "bad". Now maybe this explains that.. However, I have trouble with this notion so many of you have of enjoyment being a seperate entity from quality. If you enjoyed it, as far as I'm concerned it was good. Maybe not as well crafted as other works (yes, some things can be accepted as "better than" others by a majority, although that still has a subjective element), but my point is if you enjoyed it, it still has *value* And again, there is that issue of purpose. What was the purpose of Eragon (for example)? Well I cant be totally sure not having created it or spoken to the one that did, but from what I've read I'd say that in that case at least, it was mainly intended to entertain, and to be enjoyed. And in that, it has succeeded for thousands (myself included so far). Is it writen as well as the Lord of the Rings? No, its not. Is it objectively awful? No, its not that either. At worst, its at the low end of the spectrum of that semi-objective scale of the general criteria of the craft of writting. And for the record, although I have no "credentials" beyond having read a great deal of fantasy fiction in my life, and having tried to develop my own writing skills for the past couple of years, I feel that certain aspects of the story were (or I should say are so far) quite well crafted. I agree with your overall point. However, I have never personally read a book, or experienced any artistic work that was totally lacking in craft in all points of the general criteria of its medium. I come back to Lovecraft again. He's not real great at dialogue or characterization sure. But he's an ace on mood, theme, description and various other areas. Also note that while I am willing to agree that say for instance the kid that wrote Eragon is not, at this moment, as good a writer as Tolkien or Lovecraft or Stephen King, in any area, I think theres every chance he *could* be with additional practice. See I'm a very positive person. I believe very strongly in the potential of all things and people. Of course I also realize that statement will now be ripped to shreds, but oh well. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
Top