Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Redrobes" data-source="post: 3129675" data-attributes="member: 40793"><p><strong>Interesting topic...</strong></p><p></p><p>I have been following this thread from the start with some interest. I thought that the original question is very similar to the general question posed in the book "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance" where they take a very winding road that kinda, sorta, ends up at asking what is quality ?</p><p></p><p>In that book they discuss that everything comes down to how you look at it and one particular cut out of many from the existential scalple and you can divide everything into romantic and classical which they state is also subjective - objective. So thats what the motorcycle bit is all about in the book. Is the bike a romantic shiny toy or a collection of carefully machined objective bits of metal all fulfilling their purpose.</p><p></p><p>So by three pages of discussion we appear to be at a similar point. I think that where we are is thus. Most things - but lets focus on works of artistic merit - have some degree of objectivity and some degree of subjectivity about them. All of the objective - subjective bits are pretty easily separated with, well lets say a reasonably universally agreed basis. This can be spelling & grammar in a book, consistency and lack of opposing statements of fact in the plot vs the subjective elements that are the story, use of language, shapes and color in a picture etc.</p><p></p><p>So I believe that for all of the objective bits its easy to hold a true opinion and guage its quality easily by whether it performs the job that its designed to do. For all of the subjective bits nobody can make an opinionated statement of fact about it - its all up for grabs depending on how you individually feel about it.</p><p></p><p>So back to a certain book that I have not read. If the spelling and grammar is incorrect or the plot contradicts itself where its not desirable for it to, or purports to model reality with absurd statements then it can be considered crap no matter what story it told. As for the story, characters etc and other purely subjective parts, well its just not possible to state whether it is factually a good or bad book based upon any basis other than your own personal opinion.</p><p></p><p>Although there are examples which are almost purely objective like a CAD diagram for a mechanical part or a purly subjective piece like modern art, most things like books, movies and these posts have a bit of each.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Redrobes, post: 3129675, member: 40793"] [b]Interesting topic...[/b] I have been following this thread from the start with some interest. I thought that the original question is very similar to the general question posed in the book "Zen and the art of motorcycle maintenance" where they take a very winding road that kinda, sorta, ends up at asking what is quality ? In that book they discuss that everything comes down to how you look at it and one particular cut out of many from the existential scalple and you can divide everything into romantic and classical which they state is also subjective - objective. So thats what the motorcycle bit is all about in the book. Is the bike a romantic shiny toy or a collection of carefully machined objective bits of metal all fulfilling their purpose. So by three pages of discussion we appear to be at a similar point. I think that where we are is thus. Most things - but lets focus on works of artistic merit - have some degree of objectivity and some degree of subjectivity about them. All of the objective - subjective bits are pretty easily separated with, well lets say a reasonably universally agreed basis. This can be spelling & grammar in a book, consistency and lack of opposing statements of fact in the plot vs the subjective elements that are the story, use of language, shapes and color in a picture etc. So I believe that for all of the objective bits its easy to hold a true opinion and guage its quality easily by whether it performs the job that its designed to do. For all of the subjective bits nobody can make an opinionated statement of fact about it - its all up for grabs depending on how you individually feel about it. So back to a certain book that I have not read. If the spelling and grammar is incorrect or the plot contradicts itself where its not desirable for it to, or purports to model reality with absurd statements then it can be considered crap no matter what story it told. As for the story, characters etc and other purely subjective parts, well its just not possible to state whether it is factually a good or bad book based upon any basis other than your own personal opinion. Although there are examples which are almost purely objective like a CAD diagram for a mechanical part or a purly subjective piece like modern art, most things like books, movies and these posts have a bit of each. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
Top