Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takyris" data-source="post: 3129726" data-attributes="member: 5171"><p>But by your standards, that is <strong>not</strong> an objective statement, as I said above. The standards you use for art, when applied to your statement, would result in it failing the objective test.</p><p></p><p>If touch a red-hot heating element made of a material that gets red-hot at 100 degrees, you will not be burned. If you touch a red-hot heating element with protective gloves, you will not be burned. If you touch a red-hot heating element extremely rapidly, you will not necessarily be burned (like passing your finger rapidly through a candle's flame). If you try to breathe water, you may simply choke instead of drowning. If you try to breathe water while it is in its gaseous state as steam, you may get seared lungs, but you will not drown. If you try to breate water in the form of mist, you may simply clear out your sinuses instead of drowning.</p><p></p><p><strong>Your own standards for what qualifies something as an objective standard with which nobody can argue disqualify almost any statement one can make about anything.</strong> The agreed-upon standard of "When I say "try to breathe water", I don't mean mist or fog, I mean something like a puddle or a lake or a pool, and what I mean by "breathe" is that you're actually opening up and taking a big inhalation, not just doing a quick sniff that might just make you choke or something" is what most people agree to use so that they don't misunderstand the "Don't Breathe the Water" sign at the pool's lifeguard station and think that the lifeguard doesn't want the poor guy to use his nasal inhaler.</p><p></p><p>You are welcome to your opinion. You are even welcome to the opinion that the current standards for writing are full of garbage. But if you want to take that opinion, you really need to be able to back it up -- or be willing to walk away from the conversation.</p><p></p><p>If you want to pretend that writing standards don't actually exist or are invalid without being willing to back it up or walk away from the conversation, then you are going to lose people's respect as a voice in the conversation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takyris, post: 3129726, member: 5171"] But by your standards, that is [b]not[/b] an objective statement, as I said above. The standards you use for art, when applied to your statement, would result in it failing the objective test. If touch a red-hot heating element made of a material that gets red-hot at 100 degrees, you will not be burned. If you touch a red-hot heating element with protective gloves, you will not be burned. If you touch a red-hot heating element extremely rapidly, you will not necessarily be burned (like passing your finger rapidly through a candle's flame). If you try to breathe water, you may simply choke instead of drowning. If you try to breathe water while it is in its gaseous state as steam, you may get seared lungs, but you will not drown. If you try to breate water in the form of mist, you may simply clear out your sinuses instead of drowning. [b]Your own standards for what qualifies something as an objective standard with which nobody can argue disqualify almost any statement one can make about anything.[/b] The agreed-upon standard of "When I say "try to breathe water", I don't mean mist or fog, I mean something like a puddle or a lake or a pool, and what I mean by "breathe" is that you're actually opening up and taking a big inhalation, not just doing a quick sniff that might just make you choke or something" is what most people agree to use so that they don't misunderstand the "Don't Breathe the Water" sign at the pool's lifeguard station and think that the lifeguard doesn't want the poor guy to use his nasal inhaler. You are welcome to your opinion. You are even welcome to the opinion that the current standards for writing are full of garbage. But if you want to take that opinion, you really need to be able to back it up -- or be willing to walk away from the conversation. If you want to pretend that writing standards don't actually exist or are invalid without being willing to back it up or walk away from the conversation, then you are going to lose people's respect as a voice in the conversation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
Top