Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="bodhi" data-source="post: 3130087" data-attributes="member: 19770"><p><strong>Just a thought or two</strong></p><p></p><p>Art (like just about any activity performed by more than a single person) has rules. Following the rules doesn't guarantee the product will be great. Breaking the rules doesn't guarantee the product will be poor. If you break the rules, people will call you on it, whether negative (He can't color in the lines!) or positive (He breaks the shackles of confinement!). The rules are separate-but-related to subjective enjoyment or appreciation.</p><p></p><p>As to value, well, define "value". If you're discussing how well a particular piece follows the applicable rules, then there's objective value (which can be zero, or perhaps even negative). There may be debate on how a piece "scores", but a consensus generally forms. If you're discussing how a particular piece affected you, and how you feel about it, that's completely subjective, even if it's influenced by the objective rules. And if that piece has zero (or negative) value for you, that in no way precludes it from having a positive value for someone else. The reverse is also true. Not everyone has to appreciate something you absolutely love.</p><p></p><p>"Crap" has low objective value and low subjective value.</p><p>"Guilty pleasures" have low objective value and high subjective value.</p><p>"Highbrow" or "intellectual" or "artsy-fartsy" works have high objective value and low subjective value.</p><p>"Classics" have high objective value and high subjective value.</p><p></p><p>Now, the rules are subjective in that they are the creation of humanity, rather than something independently verifiable under lab conditions. But they're objective in that they are definitions. There are rules for spelling and grammar. They do change over time, but a misspelled word is still misspelled.</p><p></p><p>The rules also vary by form, and are determined by the practitioners and audience of that form. A painting that succeeds by the standards of abstract impressionism will fail by those of Renaissance realism. A book that succeeds as a novel may fail as a history.</p><p></p><p>If you produce a work, you're under no obligation to know or care about the rules, let alone follow them. But once you share that work, you're implicitly allowing it to be judged by those rules, regardless of your intentions in the creation.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="bodhi, post: 3130087, member: 19770"] [b]Just a thought or two[/b] Art (like just about any activity performed by more than a single person) has rules. Following the rules doesn't guarantee the product will be great. Breaking the rules doesn't guarantee the product will be poor. If you break the rules, people will call you on it, whether negative (He can't color in the lines!) or positive (He breaks the shackles of confinement!). The rules are separate-but-related to subjective enjoyment or appreciation. As to value, well, define "value". If you're discussing how well a particular piece follows the applicable rules, then there's objective value (which can be zero, or perhaps even negative). There may be debate on how a piece "scores", but a consensus generally forms. If you're discussing how a particular piece affected you, and how you feel about it, that's completely subjective, even if it's influenced by the objective rules. And if that piece has zero (or negative) value for you, that in no way precludes it from having a positive value for someone else. The reverse is also true. Not everyone has to appreciate something you absolutely love. "Crap" has low objective value and low subjective value. "Guilty pleasures" have low objective value and high subjective value. "Highbrow" or "intellectual" or "artsy-fartsy" works have high objective value and low subjective value. "Classics" have high objective value and high subjective value. Now, the rules are subjective in that they are the creation of humanity, rather than something independently verifiable under lab conditions. But they're objective in that they are definitions. There are rules for spelling and grammar. They do change over time, but a misspelled word is still misspelled. The rules also vary by form, and are determined by the practitioners and audience of that form. A painting that succeeds by the standards of abstract impressionism will fail by those of Renaissance realism. A book that succeeds as a novel may fail as a history. If you produce a work, you're under no obligation to know or care about the rules, let alone follow them. But once you share that work, you're implicitly allowing it to be judged by those rules, regardless of your intentions in the creation. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
Top