Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Merlion" data-source="post: 3133067" data-attributes="member: 10397"><p>But then we again go into the cycle of who decides what is or isnt a flaw or what criteria should be used, and how those criteria should be judged, as we've already discussed several times. You speak of a successful representation of the form...the trouble is, people have different ideas of what the form is or should be, and/or what constitutes success within it. Yes, there is usualy a concensus, but theres also usually a substantial minority that disagrees with said concensus. </p><p></p><p>What you call objective standards are by and large just a set of opinions that most, but not all people accept, save for a very few things, of which there are rarely enough of in a work to make it "objectively bad"</p><p></p><p>Now in the case of music, there is a dual aspect...performance and composition. I'd say a musical performance could be more or less objectively bad...if the wrong notes are played or played in the wrong order, flat when they shouldnt be etc. But the composition end is subjective (again realizing there are criteria that most people accept...but not all).</p><p></p><p></p><p>I also, as I've said before, believe that purpose has a lot to do with it. Now I realize you seperate purpose from quality across the board, and I dont, but even within that I will agree that a piece of art that sets forth with a certain purpose can usualy be deemed to have succeeded or failed in that purpose, or at the very least defined as objectively worse than a piece that suceeded better at the same purpose, as with Smurfy's dog painting. </p><p></p><p></p><p>And so again we come to, what is the purpose of a given work? Well I could be wrong, but usualy the purpose is to be enjoyed, to satisfy the creators creative impulses, and some times to make a statement or convey a message</p><p></p><p></p><p>Now what you seem to be getting at is your conception of "craft" as being seperate from all other factors. But again it comes back to purpose...you can have your purpose to be crafting a work that is the best crafted possible based on a certain set of standards, and call it good or bad based on wether it suceeds or not, but the thing is, and my big point is *theres more than one set of valid standards*</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Merlion, post: 3133067, member: 10397"] But then we again go into the cycle of who decides what is or isnt a flaw or what criteria should be used, and how those criteria should be judged, as we've already discussed several times. You speak of a successful representation of the form...the trouble is, people have different ideas of what the form is or should be, and/or what constitutes success within it. Yes, there is usualy a concensus, but theres also usually a substantial minority that disagrees with said concensus. What you call objective standards are by and large just a set of opinions that most, but not all people accept, save for a very few things, of which there are rarely enough of in a work to make it "objectively bad" Now in the case of music, there is a dual aspect...performance and composition. I'd say a musical performance could be more or less objectively bad...if the wrong notes are played or played in the wrong order, flat when they shouldnt be etc. But the composition end is subjective (again realizing there are criteria that most people accept...but not all). I also, as I've said before, believe that purpose has a lot to do with it. Now I realize you seperate purpose from quality across the board, and I dont, but even within that I will agree that a piece of art that sets forth with a certain purpose can usualy be deemed to have succeeded or failed in that purpose, or at the very least defined as objectively worse than a piece that suceeded better at the same purpose, as with Smurfy's dog painting. And so again we come to, what is the purpose of a given work? Well I could be wrong, but usualy the purpose is to be enjoyed, to satisfy the creators creative impulses, and some times to make a statement or convey a message Now what you seem to be getting at is your conception of "craft" as being seperate from all other factors. But again it comes back to purpose...you can have your purpose to be crafting a work that is the best crafted possible based on a certain set of standards, and call it good or bad based on wether it suceeds or not, but the thing is, and my big point is *theres more than one set of valid standards* [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Value of Art, or, "Bad" is in the Eye of the Beholder
Top