Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Grabuto138" data-source="post: 5526614" data-attributes="member: 61053">I am honestly baffled by this most recent exchange regarding the Vampire. In my experience D&D is a collabrative hobby. All the "woulda/shoulda/coulda" walls of text don't recognize that most DMs would run an adventure with the knowledge that a Vampire was in the party and would adjust accordingling to make sure everyone had fun. D&D adventures don't just happen on their own as spontaneous forces of nature. People get together for the sake of having fun. You won't find Thri-keens or Muls in our game. Right now we are doing a stylized "Age of Sail" game kind of in Eberron where the Korvaire people are the colonialists, the Dragon Marked houses are essentially the trading companies, the elves and tieflings are the natives and the party is in the process of encouraging a slave rebellion among the elves on a distant island. A Vampire could probably fit. A Shardmind has no place here. Sorry Shardmind, move along.  That stupid Bladeling thing? Why do you exist, exactly? I can see a cool campaign that includes the Shadar-kai. Not this one, though. Freakin' Wilden? What role does that fill that the shifters and elves don't already occupy? As a player my favorite class by far is the Taclord but I just can't get my head around the Genasi enough to play one. I don't get them. But many of you do. It is great that people have the option and I like options. If they don't fit don't allow them. The more options, the less painful eliminating one option is.  But by God I freakin' hate the Bladeling. That is the one thing that is so stupid I can't forgive. But if you want to play one and you have a roleplaying hook I would probably make it work.</blockquote>

Verification