Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Arrowhawk" data-source="post: 5751914" data-attributes="member: 6679551">Here is what he wrote in the OPOne of the NPC's controlled by the GM tried to do the lets be all diplomatic and vote crap so i stamped my displeasure into him with my foot. Everyone at the table is up in arms that i cant do that.That's it.&nbsp; I don't know how you go from &quot;I can't do that&quot; to &quot;pissed off at what he did.&quot;&nbsp; Did he later write that people were pissed off in another post?&nbsp; If so, I missed it and I stand corrected.&nbsp; If not, you're making assumptions.Maybe.&nbsp; I certainly would be tempted to kick his character to the curb, but at this point it's pure speculation, especially since, according to RR, the other players had no problem with him as a GM in a previous session.Maybe everything you wrote is 100% correct if the real facts where known.&nbsp; I don't see it in what's written.EDIT:You added an edit, so I'll respondOn this I think we can agree.&nbsp; It really boils down to what was actually intended by the statement, &quot;that is not how the game is going to be played.&quot;&nbsp;&nbsp; If it's just a suggestion, as you seem to interpret, then we are on the same page.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Arrowhawk, post: 5751914, member: 6679551"] Here is what he wrote in the OP [INDENT]One of the NPC's controlled by the GM tried to do the lets be all diplomatic and vote crap so i stamped my displeasure into him with my foot. Everyone at the table is up in arms that i cant do that.[/INDENT] That's it. I don't know how you go from "I can't do that" to "pissed off at what he did." Did he later write that people were pissed off in another post? If so, I missed it and I stand corrected. If not, you're making assumptions. Maybe. I certainly would be tempted to kick his character to the curb, but at this point it's pure speculation, especially since, according to RR, the other players had no problem with him as a GM in a previous session. Maybe everything you wrote is 100% correct if the real facts where known. I don't see it in what's written. EDIT: You added an edit, so I'll respond On this I think we can agree. It really boils down to what was actually intended by the statement, "that is not how the game is going to be played." If it's just a suggestion, as you seem to interpret, then we are on the same page. [/QUOTE]

Verification