Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Warlord shouldn't be a class... change my mind!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7886493" data-attributes="member: 996"><p>Not at all, <em>how</em> it's been designed has already been decided for 5e. It's got classes, backgrounds, races & sub-classes. It's got spells & slots, overnight healing and maneuvers. BA and Adv/Dis. It's DM-centric and DM-side customizeable.</p><p></p><p>That affects how a given class might be implemented in the game (rather a lot, actually), but it's no bearing on whether there should be a given class, at all.</p><p></p><p>Strange, because I was never deprived of <em>my</em> AD&D because there was a psioncs appendix in 1e, or a psionicist class in 2e. I just didn't use 'em. It was dreadfully easy on me, compared to making everyone else create their own takes of psionics. </p><p></p><p>Maybe, if there were exactly one 3PP Warlord, and it was from Paizo or another very well-regarded 3pp, <em>and</em> it was generally acclaimed and broadly endorsed, it could be adequate. If I were only concerned as a DM, it wouldn't even take that, as DM, I have tremendous latitude, and if there were a <em>good</em> Warlord out there, I could take the time to find it rather than make one myself. But, that's not the case, there's more than a couple, and they're none of 'em that well-regarded. </p><p></p><p>As a player, it's worse. You're not guaranteed to get to play the character you want, even if everything you need for it is 100% PH official, and not tagged optional like, say, feats or MCing. 3pp is getting pretty out there, the effort involved in finding the best 3pp option out there for you what you want is, itself, daunting, convincing a given DM to even look at it, kinda a long shot. "Settling" for a 'mere' option, rather than getting a PH-official class is already a big compromise from the player PoV - and it's a compromise with an unreasonable position, to begin with.</p><p></p><p>Contrast that to, as a DM or Player, declining an official option you don't want: as a player, you play something else you do want, <em>possibly</em>, if other players aren't open to catering to your distaste, and alternate groups not readily available, putting up with someone else playing one. </p><p>As a DM, you ban it from your table. Done.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7886493, member: 996"] Not at all, [I]how[/I] it's been designed has already been decided for 5e. It's got classes, backgrounds, races & sub-classes. It's got spells & slots, overnight healing and maneuvers. BA and Adv/Dis. It's DM-centric and DM-side customizeable. That affects how a given class might be implemented in the game (rather a lot, actually), but it's no bearing on whether there should be a given class, at all. Strange, because I was never deprived of [I]my[/I] AD&D because there was a psioncs appendix in 1e, or a psionicist class in 2e. I just didn't use 'em. It was dreadfully easy on me, compared to making everyone else create their own takes of psionics. Maybe, if there were exactly one 3PP Warlord, and it was from Paizo or another very well-regarded 3pp, [I]and[/I] it was generally acclaimed and broadly endorsed, it could be adequate. If I were only concerned as a DM, it wouldn't even take that, as DM, I have tremendous latitude, and if there were a [I]good[/I] Warlord out there, I could take the time to find it rather than make one myself. But, that's not the case, there's more than a couple, and they're none of 'em that well-regarded. As a player, it's worse. You're not guaranteed to get to play the character you want, even if everything you need for it is 100% PH official, and not tagged optional like, say, feats or MCing. 3pp is getting pretty out there, the effort involved in finding the best 3pp option out there for you what you want is, itself, daunting, convincing a given DM to even look at it, kinda a long shot. "Settling" for a 'mere' option, rather than getting a PH-official class is already a big compromise from the player PoV - and it's a compromise with an unreasonable position, to begin with. Contrast that to, as a DM or Player, declining an official option you don't want: as a player, you play something else you do want, [I]possibly[/I], if other players aren't open to catering to your distaste, and alternate groups not readily available, putting up with someone else playing one. As a DM, you ban it from your table. Done. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Warlord shouldn't be a class... change my mind!
Top