Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Tony Vargas" data-source="post: 7886557" data-attributes="member: 996">Well, if it ever makes it as far as a UA, you'll be able to playtest it.&nbsp; And, like I said, if you play a 3rd level BM with just the right maneuvers, you might get an inkling of what a 1st-level Warlord might like.&nbsp; But take it with a grain of salt, like playing an AT at 3rd level to understand what the wizard might be like.Slower healing is a matter of making rests take longer, it was seamless to implement in 4e, if anyone'd actually wanted to.&nbsp; And literally all 13 of 5e's classes have magical powers.&nbsp; Heck, even the simplest sub-class, the Champion, has a few limited-use powers, though they're not magical.Don's point looked simple, like everything in his list is still present in 5e, but somehow no longer an issue.If he's being optimistic, I suppose, the takeway might be that a warlord wouldn't be anymore of a problem to accept, once it gets the 5e treatment?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Tony Vargas, post: 7886557, member: 996"] Well, if it ever makes it as far as a UA, you'll be able to playtest it. And, like I said, if you play a 3rd level BM with just the right maneuvers, you might get an inkling of what a 1st-level Warlord might like. But take it with a grain of salt, like playing an AT at 3rd level to understand what the wizard might be like. Slower healing is a matter of making rests take longer, it was seamless to implement in 4e, if anyone'd actually wanted to. And literally all 13 of 5e's classes have magical powers. Heck, even the simplest sub-class, the Champion, has a few limited-use powers, though they're not magical. Don's point looked simple, like everything in his list is still present in 5e, but somehow no longer an issue. If he's being optimistic, I suppose, the takeway might be that a warlord wouldn't be anymore of a problem to accept, once it gets the 5e treatment? [/QUOTE]

Verification