Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Warlord shouldn't be a class... change my mind!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 7886693" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>And, if this was the argument being put forward, then fair enough. But, why isn't there the sturm and drang over Alchemists? Never minding that in the past five years, WotC has added, what, about 50 new sub-classes? Officially, and not just UA. So, why is it only in the Warlord threads that we see "I don't want the addition of any new classes"? </p><p></p><p>WotC IS going to add new classes. We know that. Asking for a popular class to be brought up to date is hardly an outrageous request. </p><p></p><p>If folks were consistently against the addition of any classes, then, fair enough. I can totally understand that POV, even if I don't share it. But, it's not consistent. And, again, you're trying to paint this as if this EXACT same conversation hasn't been going on for ten years. Ever since the early days of 4e, I've had this IDENTICAL, word for word conversation with the same sorts of people who have never picked up a 4e book, have zero idea what the class actually represents, have zero experience with the class, but, for some reason, seem to think that their completely unfounded and unsupported opinion should carry weight and then repeatedly crash into every single warlord thread, over and over and over and over again, expecting to be treated with respect and proclaiming with wide eyed innocence how they are just trying to protect the fun.</p><p></p><p>It's trolling. Pure and simple. If you've (and again, I mean this to anyone reading this, not you personally [USER=6799753]@lowkey13[/USER]) never played 4e, never seen a warlord in play, then you have ZERO right to an opinion. You're talking out of your ass and I'm tired of having to educate people yet again who can't be bothered to actually pick up a book and RTFM and learn some actual facts before spouting off and derailing another thread yet again for the umpteenth time.</p><p></p><p>It's incredibly frustrating. And, for some reason, it only really seems to happen in warlord threads. Psions? They can be talked about until the cows come home. No problems. Alchemists? Not a worry. But put Warlords on the table? Oh HELL no, that must be fought tooth and nail and buried under reams of garbage drive by thread crapping until it goes away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 7886693, member: 22779"] And, if this was the argument being put forward, then fair enough. But, why isn't there the sturm and drang over Alchemists? Never minding that in the past five years, WotC has added, what, about 50 new sub-classes? Officially, and not just UA. So, why is it only in the Warlord threads that we see "I don't want the addition of any new classes"? WotC IS going to add new classes. We know that. Asking for a popular class to be brought up to date is hardly an outrageous request. If folks were consistently against the addition of any classes, then, fair enough. I can totally understand that POV, even if I don't share it. But, it's not consistent. And, again, you're trying to paint this as if this EXACT same conversation hasn't been going on for ten years. Ever since the early days of 4e, I've had this IDENTICAL, word for word conversation with the same sorts of people who have never picked up a 4e book, have zero idea what the class actually represents, have zero experience with the class, but, for some reason, seem to think that their completely unfounded and unsupported opinion should carry weight and then repeatedly crash into every single warlord thread, over and over and over and over again, expecting to be treated with respect and proclaiming with wide eyed innocence how they are just trying to protect the fun. It's trolling. Pure and simple. If you've (and again, I mean this to anyone reading this, not you personally [USER=6799753]@lowkey13[/USER]) never played 4e, never seen a warlord in play, then you have ZERO right to an opinion. You're talking out of your ass and I'm tired of having to educate people yet again who can't be bothered to actually pick up a book and RTFM and learn some actual facts before spouting off and derailing another thread yet again for the umpteenth time. It's incredibly frustrating. And, for some reason, it only really seems to happen in warlord threads. Psions? They can be talked about until the cows come home. No problems. Alchemists? Not a worry. But put Warlords on the table? Oh HELL no, that must be fought tooth and nail and buried under reams of garbage drive by thread crapping until it goes away. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
The Warlord shouldn't be a class... change my mind!
Top