Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The "We Can't Roleplay" in 4E Argument
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ryujin" data-source="post: 5575944" data-attributes="member: 27897"><p>I'm afraid that, on this point, my argument is going to sound a bit circular, but try to follow me. The division between story elements and mechanical elements is generally the divide between concrete dice rolling and role play elements. That is modified by the game system, though, as not all games have the same mechanics, nor consider the same things to require mechanics. Certainly story elements can be worked into a mechanical process but those things must be made to fit within the existing mechanical framework, when found necessary. They don't require the creation of additional mechanics.</p><p></p><p>I, quite frankly, shudder to think how the people who require a skill for everything would have done in my original 1e campaign. They never would have considered doing what the Paladin did, play the lute in front of the gathered nobility of Greyhawk in Keoland, because it wasn't codified to the Nth degree. Their game experience would have suffered, because they would have spent their time arguing that they needed to have a skills system added to the game.</p><p></p><p>Our life experience tends to colour how we see things should work, within the universe of the game. We hand-wave the experiences of others, as being unimportant to game play, but our own are so important that they <strong><em>MUST</em></strong> be used. Because I'm a musician or artist, there must be art and musi8c skills to codify how well you can perform. My own experience in science is, however, handwaved off with comments like, "It's magic." </p><p></p><p>Just play the game. If the mechanics don't work as intended or stated, that's one thing; fix it. If something isn't written into the mechanics, just go with it. There will be a way to handle it.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I'm afraid that you're missing my point. You can't use intimidate to make a rote joke funny, but you can use it in <em>crafting a new joke</em>, to help make it funny, and by helping to create the narrative. How good is a Farmer's Daughter joke, without a scary farmer? Bluff can likewise be used in its creation but it can also be used in the telling, as a measure of <em>comic timing</em>.</p><p></p><p>Check some of the skill challenges, in published modules. There's a reason why you can't spam one skill, all the way through them <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ryujin, post: 5575944, member: 27897"] I'm afraid that, on this point, my argument is going to sound a bit circular, but try to follow me. The division between story elements and mechanical elements is generally the divide between concrete dice rolling and role play elements. That is modified by the game system, though, as not all games have the same mechanics, nor consider the same things to require mechanics. Certainly story elements can be worked into a mechanical process but those things must be made to fit within the existing mechanical framework, when found necessary. They don't require the creation of additional mechanics. I, quite frankly, shudder to think how the people who require a skill for everything would have done in my original 1e campaign. They never would have considered doing what the Paladin did, play the lute in front of the gathered nobility of Greyhawk in Keoland, because it wasn't codified to the Nth degree. Their game experience would have suffered, because they would have spent their time arguing that they needed to have a skills system added to the game. Our life experience tends to colour how we see things should work, within the universe of the game. We hand-wave the experiences of others, as being unimportant to game play, but our own are so important that they [B][I]MUST[/I][/B] be used. Because I'm a musician or artist, there must be art and musi8c skills to codify how well you can perform. My own experience in science is, however, handwaved off with comments like, "It's magic." Just play the game. If the mechanics don't work as intended or stated, that's one thing; fix it. If something isn't written into the mechanics, just go with it. There will be a way to handle it. I'm afraid that you're missing my point. You can't use intimidate to make a rote joke funny, but you can use it in [I]crafting a new joke[/I], to help make it funny, and by helping to create the narrative. How good is a Farmer's Daughter joke, without a scary farmer? Bluff can likewise be used in its creation but it can also be used in the telling, as a measure of [I]comic timing[/I]. Check some of the skill challenges, in published modules. There's a reason why you can't spam one skill, all the way through them ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The "We Can't Roleplay" in 4E Argument
Top