Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The "We Can't Roleplay" in 4E Argument
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Raven Crowking" data-source="post: 5577230" data-attributes="member: 18280"><p>I would argue that character concept and role-playing are entirely different things. </p><p></p><p>I would assume that you wouldn't argue that 4e was less of a role-playing game when just the PHB was released (because of fewer options than now)? I would assume that you wouldn't argue that Top Secret was less of a role-playing game because it didn't feature elves?</p><p></p><p>IMHO, a game allows for role-playing based only on two factors:</p><p></p><p>1. Does the player get to make meaningful choices within the context of the game's fiction (noting that meaningful choices include consequences to the choices made.....talking in a funny voice while playing Silent Hill does nothing in terms of game play) through taking a particular role?</p><p></p><p>2. How much and how often do the rules break immersion in role?</p><p></p><p>The first is probably more objective than the second, as one can easily see that neighing while moving the horse in chess isn't a meaningful decision, but it is still subjective to some (and perhaps some not-inconsiderable) degree.</p><p></p><p>The second is going to depend upon a number of factors, which I did my best to outline earlier, and which also require largely subjective analysis. As noted just above (and in my previous post), as one learns the rules of a game, the game rules become more natural, and break immersion less.</p><p></p><p>With these points in mind, it is easy to see that there will not be "one true answer" or "one true gauge" of how well a game functions as a role-playing game. But, it is also true that system matters.</p><p></p><p>As a simple test of the "system matters" principle, if system did not matter, few (if any) would throw their money away on other systems. Once you tried one, you would stick with that one. Why not? If system doesn't matter, then there is no benefit to changing system.</p><p></p><p>(I also find the idea that system doesn't matter to be a colossal insult to the good folks who spend so long designing and playtesting those systems.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>RC</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Raven Crowking, post: 5577230, member: 18280"] I would argue that character concept and role-playing are entirely different things. I would assume that you wouldn't argue that 4e was less of a role-playing game when just the PHB was released (because of fewer options than now)? I would assume that you wouldn't argue that Top Secret was less of a role-playing game because it didn't feature elves? IMHO, a game allows for role-playing based only on two factors: 1. Does the player get to make meaningful choices within the context of the game's fiction (noting that meaningful choices include consequences to the choices made.....talking in a funny voice while playing Silent Hill does nothing in terms of game play) through taking a particular role? 2. How much and how often do the rules break immersion in role? The first is probably more objective than the second, as one can easily see that neighing while moving the horse in chess isn't a meaningful decision, but it is still subjective to some (and perhaps some not-inconsiderable) degree. The second is going to depend upon a number of factors, which I did my best to outline earlier, and which also require largely subjective analysis. As noted just above (and in my previous post), as one learns the rules of a game, the game rules become more natural, and break immersion less. With these points in mind, it is easy to see that there will not be "one true answer" or "one true gauge" of how well a game functions as a role-playing game. But, it is also true that system matters. As a simple test of the "system matters" principle, if system did not matter, few (if any) would throw their money away on other systems. Once you tried one, you would stick with that one. Why not? If system doesn't matter, then there is no benefit to changing system. (I also find the idea that system doesn't matter to be a colossal insult to the good folks who spend so long designing and playtesting those systems.) RC [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
The "We Can't Roleplay" in 4E Argument
Top