Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Witcher...*rocks*
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="LrdApoc" data-source="post: 3936110" data-attributes="member: 1882"><p>Steel Wind, I know I can't add much here to your points because an indepth review of a title would ideally cover all the things you mention, however as you say reviewers are payed to turn things around quickly. This season I've had to churn out a good number of reviews and the approach I take as a professional reviewer is to give the player a feel for if they want to try a game.</p><p></p><p>Now in both the reviews I wrote of The Witcher I had not completed the game before I wrote them. I had however played into Chapter III. Same with Mass Effect. I'd played most of the way through the games, I'd dallied with subquests, etc. I had a good feel for the systems and what I felt people needed to know to decide if they wanted to invest the time in any of these games.</p><p></p><p>That is my goal as a reviewer... to explain the experience, to give my insight into the gameplay, the story and how much a game is fun or not. There are some games I will never finish before reviewing.. Kane & Lynch being one. Its not something I enjoyed so I have pushed it off the review plate and moved on.. </p><p></p><p>There is a great debate about the value of a review, a debate we see all the time. The reality is that for hardcore fans there is really little impact. Hardcore players do not take just one voice into consideration.. nor should any consumer to be frank - I know I don't and I write professionally about this silly industry. It is the casual player, the occasional consumer that benefits from reviews and often does not have the time or interest to research a purchase.</p><p></p><p>Its sad to some extent because the expectation of experience and knowledge about games, gameplay and gaming itself is effectively as low as : I can type and almost always spell. The mark of a good review is that is speaks to the reader, unfortunately not every style suits every reader.</p><p></p><p>Sorry I've ranted - the gist though is I agree that The Witcher received a short shrift from some who did not spend more than 5-8 hours with the game. But I didn't need more than that as a player to know that I was happy with my purchase.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="LrdApoc, post: 3936110, member: 1882"] Steel Wind, I know I can't add much here to your points because an indepth review of a title would ideally cover all the things you mention, however as you say reviewers are payed to turn things around quickly. This season I've had to churn out a good number of reviews and the approach I take as a professional reviewer is to give the player a feel for if they want to try a game. Now in both the reviews I wrote of The Witcher I had not completed the game before I wrote them. I had however played into Chapter III. Same with Mass Effect. I'd played most of the way through the games, I'd dallied with subquests, etc. I had a good feel for the systems and what I felt people needed to know to decide if they wanted to invest the time in any of these games. That is my goal as a reviewer... to explain the experience, to give my insight into the gameplay, the story and how much a game is fun or not. There are some games I will never finish before reviewing.. Kane & Lynch being one. Its not something I enjoyed so I have pushed it off the review plate and moved on.. There is a great debate about the value of a review, a debate we see all the time. The reality is that for hardcore fans there is really little impact. Hardcore players do not take just one voice into consideration.. nor should any consumer to be frank - I know I don't and I write professionally about this silly industry. It is the casual player, the occasional consumer that benefits from reviews and often does not have the time or interest to research a purchase. Its sad to some extent because the expectation of experience and knowledge about games, gameplay and gaming itself is effectively as low as : I can type and almost always spell. The mark of a good review is that is speaks to the reader, unfortunately not every style suits every reader. Sorry I've ranted - the gist though is I agree that The Witcher received a short shrift from some who did not spend more than 5-8 hours with the game. But I didn't need more than that as a player to know that I was happy with my purchase. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The Witcher...*rocks*
Top