Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="jollyninja" data-source="post: 164096" data-attributes="member: 3208">i can't believe that nobody has given the award for worst nonsensical prerequisites: weaponmaster, does not need weapon specialisation, does need a bunch of multipurpose feats relating little with the concept of a weaponmaster, which lead to a bunch of abilities derived from the feats that made no sense before. how does limiting the abilities to a single weapon balance things out? typically, characters only carry a couple weapons around anyway with one being their trademark weapon.tempest: requires alot of the same feats as weapon master, but has no abilities that could be derived from these feats. i consider it the ultimate feat chain PrC, the fact that it gets more class abilities (which should just have been feats) then a fighter does really irritates me. i thought the fighter was supposed to be the ultimate combat machine in the area he has chosen to specialise in. apparently i was wrong.warmaster: needs weapon specialisation, why? prowess with a specific weapon has nothing to do with the class. or any of the derivative abilities</blockquote>