Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="KDLadage" data-source="post: 75080" data-attributes="member: 88">Yes, I do. And thank you.That is my strong point -- the concepts. That is also why, for my more 'professional' stuff, I let NSRuf look over it and make sure I am not smoking anything... <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile&nbsp; &nbsp; :)"&nbsp; data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />I liked the idea of the cabin; the fireplace was an afterthought. Still, I get your meaning and point well taken.I just thought it added something to the effect -- you are, of course, free to ignore that. YMMV.My bad. 1/2 damage.The last (shaded) paragraph explains that one. And no, I do not feel &quot;formalizing&quot; that would be a good idea. Magic should, very often times, be mysterious. Something that D&amp;D magic lacks far too often.Agreed. If I had it to do over, that would be the case. The fireplace would more than likely be just a plain fireplace, no magic at all.That was intentional. It will all depend entirely on the way the Dungeon Master sees the ability. If this is something akin to &quot;true love conquers all&quot; then it is something akin to Extraordinary (or even something that goes beyond the three classifications). I, personally, would use it as a &quot;Primal&quot; ability (a.k.a.: The Primal Order -- this means that it cannot be countered; period).Your call, and I am glad it got you thinking. However, I think that linking these to the place weakens the idea of this &quot;true love lost&quot; possibility.But thanks for the feedback. And glad you liked it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="KDLadage, post: 75080, member: 88"] Yes, I do. And thank you. That is my strong point -- the concepts. That is also why, for my more 'professional' stuff, I let NSRuf look over it and make sure I am not smoking anything... :) I liked the idea of the cabin; the fireplace was an afterthought. Still, I get your meaning and point well taken. I just thought it added something to the effect -- you are, of course, free to ignore that. YMMV. My bad. 1/2 damage. The last (shaded) paragraph explains that one. And no, I do not feel "formalizing" that would be a good idea. Magic should, very often times, be mysterious. Something that D&D magic lacks far too often. Agreed. If I had it to do over, that would be the case. The fireplace would more than likely be just a plain fireplace, no magic at all. That was intentional. It will all depend entirely on the way the Dungeon Master sees the ability. If this is something akin to "true love conquers all" then it is something akin to Extraordinary (or even something that goes beyond the three classifications). I, personally, would use it as a "Primal" ability (a.k.a.: The Primal Order -- this means that it cannot be countered; period). Your call, and I am glad it got you thinking. However, I think that linking these to the place weakens the idea of this "true love lost" possibility. But thanks for the feedback. And glad you liked it. [/QUOTE]

Verification