Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The X-Box 360
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="drothgery" data-source="post: 2268524" data-attributes="member: 360"><p>Heck, the Dreamcast's time advantage probably hurt Sega. If both cosoles had launched at the same time, there would have been scores of articles out there saying "Hey, wait a second, why do the Dreamcast games all look better than the PS2 games?".</p><p></p><p>It's another reason why, though I'm definitely in Microsoft's camp (I'll get a PS3 eventually, unless by some odd chance FFXIII is awful or isn't a PS3 exclusive), I've got serious questions about their strategy with the 360.</p><p></p><p>Rushing to be the first to market in the next generation seems like a waste of effort; being the first mover was never decisive in the console wars -- especially when they were the last (well, the US launches of the Xbox and GameCube were within days of each other) of the current generation. I'm a major skeptic when it comes to the CPU designs both Sony and Microsoft are using (less so with Microsoft, but I still don't like it). 100% backward compatibility out of the box matters more than most people think. If Microsoft's not spinning things too much, they're outselling the PS2 in North America now, and have a stronger lineup of games to sell this year. Halo 3 can't be ready for a 2005 launch.</p><p></p><p>Fortunately Sony's being even more irrational. They're making a mad dash to launch as soon as possible, but Spring 2006 will likely turn out to mean May, and in Japan only, even though their past experience -- and Nintendo's with the SNES -- should have shown them that being a year late to the party is fine. Which means they ended with a PC GPU instead of a console GPU, as nVidia didn't have time to design one, and that's going to cost them money in the long run (ask Microsoft about this). The Cell is even wackier than a triple-core in-order PPC. </p><p></p><p>I don't get it. How did we go from two relatively cleanly designed machines (the Xbox and GameCube), albeit one of them not especially profitable (Xbox), to the frankenboxes that are the PS3 and Xbox 360 (and quite possibly the Revolution as well)?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="drothgery, post: 2268524, member: 360"] Heck, the Dreamcast's time advantage probably hurt Sega. If both cosoles had launched at the same time, there would have been scores of articles out there saying "Hey, wait a second, why do the Dreamcast games all look better than the PS2 games?". It's another reason why, though I'm definitely in Microsoft's camp (I'll get a PS3 eventually, unless by some odd chance FFXIII is awful or isn't a PS3 exclusive), I've got serious questions about their strategy with the 360. Rushing to be the first to market in the next generation seems like a waste of effort; being the first mover was never decisive in the console wars -- especially when they were the last (well, the US launches of the Xbox and GameCube were within days of each other) of the current generation. I'm a major skeptic when it comes to the CPU designs both Sony and Microsoft are using (less so with Microsoft, but I still don't like it). 100% backward compatibility out of the box matters more than most people think. If Microsoft's not spinning things too much, they're outselling the PS2 in North America now, and have a stronger lineup of games to sell this year. Halo 3 can't be ready for a 2005 launch. Fortunately Sony's being even more irrational. They're making a mad dash to launch as soon as possible, but Spring 2006 will likely turn out to mean May, and in Japan only, even though their past experience -- and Nintendo's with the SNES -- should have shown them that being a year late to the party is fine. Which means they ended with a PC GPU instead of a console GPU, as nVidia didn't have time to design one, and that's going to cost them money in the long run (ask Microsoft about this). The Cell is even wackier than a triple-core in-order PPC. I don't get it. How did we go from two relatively cleanly designed machines (the Xbox and GameCube), albeit one of them not especially profitable (Xbox), to the frankenboxes that are the PS3 and Xbox 360 (and quite possibly the Revolution as well)? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
The X-Box 360
Top