Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Theft and Alignment
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ARandomGod" data-source="post: 1486115" data-attributes="member: 17296"><p>Actually, I think that this is not only fine, but makes it easier to play neutral. You just have to not take things to extremes.</p><p></p><p></p><p>"Good do things for others/against evil."</p><p>So if you are doing something for another, that's against evil, and therefore not an evil act. But it is not necessarily a good act either. It is, indeed a neutral act.</p><p></p><p>"Evil do things for self/against good."</p><p>Doing things for yourself is against good, ie not good. But not evil, just not good. Or to say, neutral.</p><p></p><p>Both "good" acts AND "evil" acts can also be neutral acts. That is the reaon for and definition of neutral.</p><p></p><p>All the people above who seem to think about a concept "NO, that is EVIL"</p><p>They're not entirely wrong, they just have no concept of neutral. </p><p>Hell, most Good people think of neutrals as evil. But they're not.</p><p></p><p>And I've noticed a tendancy from that type of individual to either not be able to describe a neutral act at all (A lot of the above examples saying what's evil and not neutral fail to meantion what's neutral and not good) Generally they simply think of neutral as a lesser form of good.</p><p></p><p>And that, in my opinion. Is just someone with a lack of imagination.</p><p>And someone who can't actually concieve of evil, generally.</p><p>If ANYthing that's not good is evil, then that seriously lessens what evil actually IS. Which, I suppose, isn't a bad thing, really. It's innocent, naive, and shows a lack of experience and imagination, as I said above, but really it's kind of sweet. </p><p></p><p>Remember: "Evil is not who you kill, it's how you identify magic items"</p><p>**Inside joke. Who and why you kill is actually a good definition of evil. But it's not the only one. As follows:</p><p>... from an evil character played by my brother. He was a halfling... used to sneak into the villiage homes at night and befriend the little children do nice things for them. Give them little gifts, be sweet. Tell 'em he was a magic "brownie", and they couldn't tell anyone or he couldn't come again.</p><p></p><p>Get them to try on these magic boots he found...</p><p></p><p>"If she dances 'till her feet bleed and won't stop, I leave. If something good happens, I see if she can take 'em off, and we'll go try little billy's house next."</p><p></p><p>I think that was evil. And he never really stole anything, or killed anyone. He was only nice to people. Other people he was with killed people and stole things, but it's not like he liked or trusted those guys.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ARandomGod, post: 1486115, member: 17296"] Actually, I think that this is not only fine, but makes it easier to play neutral. You just have to not take things to extremes. "Good do things for others/against evil." So if you are doing something for another, that's against evil, and therefore not an evil act. But it is not necessarily a good act either. It is, indeed a neutral act. "Evil do things for self/against good." Doing things for yourself is against good, ie not good. But not evil, just not good. Or to say, neutral. Both "good" acts AND "evil" acts can also be neutral acts. That is the reaon for and definition of neutral. All the people above who seem to think about a concept "NO, that is EVIL" They're not entirely wrong, they just have no concept of neutral. Hell, most Good people think of neutrals as evil. But they're not. And I've noticed a tendancy from that type of individual to either not be able to describe a neutral act at all (A lot of the above examples saying what's evil and not neutral fail to meantion what's neutral and not good) Generally they simply think of neutral as a lesser form of good. And that, in my opinion. Is just someone with a lack of imagination. And someone who can't actually concieve of evil, generally. If ANYthing that's not good is evil, then that seriously lessens what evil actually IS. Which, I suppose, isn't a bad thing, really. It's innocent, naive, and shows a lack of experience and imagination, as I said above, but really it's kind of sweet. Remember: "Evil is not who you kill, it's how you identify magic items" **Inside joke. Who and why you kill is actually a good definition of evil. But it's not the only one. As follows: ... from an evil character played by my brother. He was a halfling... used to sneak into the villiage homes at night and befriend the little children do nice things for them. Give them little gifts, be sweet. Tell 'em he was a magic "brownie", and they couldn't tell anyone or he couldn't come again. Get them to try on these magic boots he found... "If she dances 'till her feet bleed and won't stop, I leave. If something good happens, I see if she can take 'em off, and we'll go try little billy's house next." I think that was evil. And he never really stole anything, or killed anyone. He was only nice to people. Other people he was with killed people and stole things, but it's not like he liked or trusted those guys. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Theft and Alignment
Top