Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Themes article up
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WalterKovacs" data-source="post: 5553110" data-attributes="member: 63763"><p>Even with Dark Sun, they were already trying to juggle and work around the whole AEDU vs. psionic issue. And, they have sort of made a 'path' to give encounter powers to the characters with no leveled encounter powers via feats. So they could concievably put encounter attack powers back in to the concept of themes.</p><p> </p><p>Personally though, utility powers are the easiest to design/balance probably, since you don't have to see "what would ANY class do with this power which uses their best attack stat ..." in each case. While essentials may have played a role, it may also be that, just like they only did racial utility powers, they felt that keeping it to your starting encounter power (which scales automatically), utilities and static class features it would be easier to design. </p><p> </p><p>Also, it's only because of the Dark Sun themes that this problem is coming up. If these were the original themes, it wouldn't necessarily have occured to someone that a class feature being added over and above all the existing parts of a character is actually <em>denying</em> them something. And it's a bit weird to say the only way something can support pre-Essential classe is to inentionally be unusable or less usable by post Essential classes. Making themes and feats and paragon paths, etc, available for everyone is probably better han making them niche. And of the themes, the power-swap powers are an optional element to an optional element. <em>IF</em> someone takes the theme, they might take one of the powers, but only if it's better than, or significantly different than, something they get from their own class. With utilities, that's easy, as the range of possible utilities is vast, and 'generic' ones keep getting added (skills, racial, theme). </p><p> </p><p>Or, it may simply be that it depends on the theme. A gladiator would learn attack techniques, while a wizard's apprentice or alchemist are more backgrounds that would reflect book learning and thust lean towards mostly towards utility ideas, etc.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WalterKovacs, post: 5553110, member: 63763"] Even with Dark Sun, they were already trying to juggle and work around the whole AEDU vs. psionic issue. And, they have sort of made a 'path' to give encounter powers to the characters with no leveled encounter powers via feats. So they could concievably put encounter attack powers back in to the concept of themes. Personally though, utility powers are the easiest to design/balance probably, since you don't have to see "what would ANY class do with this power which uses their best attack stat ..." in each case. While essentials may have played a role, it may also be that, just like they only did racial utility powers, they felt that keeping it to your starting encounter power (which scales automatically), utilities and static class features it would be easier to design. Also, it's only because of the Dark Sun themes that this problem is coming up. If these were the original themes, it wouldn't necessarily have occured to someone that a class feature being added over and above all the existing parts of a character is actually [i]denying[/i] them something. And it's a bit weird to say the only way something can support pre-Essential classe is to inentionally be unusable or less usable by post Essential classes. Making themes and feats and paragon paths, etc, available for everyone is probably better han making them niche. And of the themes, the power-swap powers are an optional element to an optional element. [i]IF[/i] someone takes the theme, they might take one of the powers, but only if it's better than, or significantly different than, something they get from their own class. With utilities, that's easy, as the range of possible utilities is vast, and 'generic' ones keep getting added (skills, racial, theme). Or, it may simply be that it depends on the theme. A gladiator would learn attack techniques, while a wizard's apprentice or alchemist are more backgrounds that would reflect book learning and thust lean towards mostly towards utility ideas, etc. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Themes article up
Top