Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Themes: What's the Catch?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Old Gumphrey" data-source="post: 5306399" data-attributes="member: 12872"><p>Is anyone actually doing that in this thread? If you're directing that at me, I think you'll need to reexamine my posts and keep your snark to yourself. If not, good enough.</p><p></p><p>As to the rest, do you honestly believe a person who made a post 6 months ago suggesting that every character get a free at-will power (the agreed upon power level of these thematic encounter powers by the rest of the thread) useable as an encounter power, so long as it fit their character's "theme", wouldn't have been flamed out of existence? Because I firmly believe that they would have. </p><p></p><p>You made some pretty good points, but you're also completely kidding yourself if you think a character with a theme, especially a low-heroic character, is not more powerful than one without. I mean...the psionic theme just straight up grants you an extra Power Point. That is the <strong>definition</strong> of power creep. As I said about backgrounds: just because a theme doesn't turn a campaign on its head and tickle its bum until it starts farting kittens does not mean that it does not increase your power. When you get <strong>something </strong>for the cost of <strong>nothing</strong>, that is power creep.</p><p></p><p>Themes are unequivocally power creep. Is that bad? Doubtful. Is it more fun? Probably. Is it still power creep? It sure is. You even said yourself that it "noticeably increases power", so why are we even opposed on the matter? </p><p></p><p>You know what'd make a lot more sense to me? If you were still limited to 3 encounter powers maximum. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nobody ever said it was "huge power creep". Your argument does not make sense in light of that fact.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Old Gumphrey, post: 5306399, member: 12872"] Is anyone actually doing that in this thread? If you're directing that at me, I think you'll need to reexamine my posts and keep your snark to yourself. If not, good enough. As to the rest, do you honestly believe a person who made a post 6 months ago suggesting that every character get a free at-will power (the agreed upon power level of these thematic encounter powers by the rest of the thread) useable as an encounter power, so long as it fit their character's "theme", wouldn't have been flamed out of existence? Because I firmly believe that they would have. You made some pretty good points, but you're also completely kidding yourself if you think a character with a theme, especially a low-heroic character, is not more powerful than one without. I mean...the psionic theme just straight up grants you an extra Power Point. That is the [b]definition[/b] of power creep. As I said about backgrounds: just because a theme doesn't turn a campaign on its head and tickle its bum until it starts farting kittens does not mean that it does not increase your power. When you get [B]something [/B]for the cost of [B]nothing[/B], that is power creep. Themes are unequivocally power creep. Is that bad? Doubtful. Is it more fun? Probably. Is it still power creep? It sure is. You even said yourself that it "noticeably increases power", so why are we even opposed on the matter? You know what'd make a lot more sense to me? If you were still limited to 3 encounter powers maximum. Nobody ever said it was "huge power creep". Your argument does not make sense in light of that fact. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Themes: What's the Catch?
Top