Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Theological Question and The End
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 348559" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>I agree regarding paraphrases.</p><p></p><p>As to the meaning of the verse, I'm hesitant to speculate. I'm sure it hasn't been clear to anyone in thousands of years what it is supposed to mean. It probably wasn't even clear to the Leviticus editors, they just dutifully copied it down and argued over its meaning just as we do now. However, since we are specifically talking about using the theory in a fictional context...</p><p></p><p>WARNING: THEOLOGICAL SPECULATION FROM HERE ON OUT IS JUST THAT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A BASIS FOR SERIOUS FAITH OR TAUGHT AS SUCH TO NEW CONVERTS.</p><p></p><p>A personal theory of mine is that thier were multiple creation events. That is to say, that creation was and is an ongoing process. This would agree with the palentological record and our observations of the world around us. It would also convienently explain how multiple creation accounts slipped into genesis (leaving aside the specific difficulties that entails), and why the Leviticus editors saw no need to try to reconcile multiple accounts (which they could have easily done). The world has not been static since creation, and even a few thousand years (if we want to be fundamentalist without good cause IMO) is a very long time. Four and a half billion years is a very long time, and more than enough time for a creative God to (if it is not too anthromorphic to think so) 'playfully' experiment before getting down to more 'serious' business. </p><p></p><p>In this light, the notion that God started out with several branches of humanity is not so startling. Exactly what happened to the others isn't my business (I suspect we killed them), but it is possible that the Nephillim reference refers to a time when humanity could remember that it had several distinct branches - labeled by the author 'Sons of God' (decendents of the Adam creation), and 'daughters of men' (decendents of earlier creation events which the author could not fully comprehend). (BTW, its pretty obvious that the author came from a patriarchal culture isn't it.) People being people, and the 'Sons of God' and the 'daughters of men' apparantly concurring that people are people, put aside racial differences that make the minor differences between modern humans seem trivial, hybridized, with the result being certain genetic disorders, the most notable of which being giganticism. </p><p></p><p>The likely hybrid in question would have been the Neaderthals who coexisted with us for, well, a very long time. Given the fact that there is some scientific speculation about hybridization, and what we know about Neaderthal physical traits, this makes a very intriguing theory to me.</p><p></p><p>Of course, its just that, and has no real textual evidence, just as any speculation on this subject is pretty baseless. However, as a theory to introduce into a role playing fictionalization, it has its merits.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 348559, member: 4937"] I agree regarding paraphrases. As to the meaning of the verse, I'm hesitant to speculate. I'm sure it hasn't been clear to anyone in thousands of years what it is supposed to mean. It probably wasn't even clear to the Leviticus editors, they just dutifully copied it down and argued over its meaning just as we do now. However, since we are specifically talking about using the theory in a fictional context... WARNING: THEOLOGICAL SPECULATION FROM HERE ON OUT IS JUST THAT AND SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED A BASIS FOR SERIOUS FAITH OR TAUGHT AS SUCH TO NEW CONVERTS. A personal theory of mine is that thier were multiple creation events. That is to say, that creation was and is an ongoing process. This would agree with the palentological record and our observations of the world around us. It would also convienently explain how multiple creation accounts slipped into genesis (leaving aside the specific difficulties that entails), and why the Leviticus editors saw no need to try to reconcile multiple accounts (which they could have easily done). The world has not been static since creation, and even a few thousand years (if we want to be fundamentalist without good cause IMO) is a very long time. Four and a half billion years is a very long time, and more than enough time for a creative God to (if it is not too anthromorphic to think so) 'playfully' experiment before getting down to more 'serious' business. In this light, the notion that God started out with several branches of humanity is not so startling. Exactly what happened to the others isn't my business (I suspect we killed them), but it is possible that the Nephillim reference refers to a time when humanity could remember that it had several distinct branches - labeled by the author 'Sons of God' (decendents of the Adam creation), and 'daughters of men' (decendents of earlier creation events which the author could not fully comprehend). (BTW, its pretty obvious that the author came from a patriarchal culture isn't it.) People being people, and the 'Sons of God' and the 'daughters of men' apparantly concurring that people are people, put aside racial differences that make the minor differences between modern humans seem trivial, hybridized, with the result being certain genetic disorders, the most notable of which being giganticism. The likely hybrid in question would have been the Neaderthals who coexisted with us for, well, a very long time. Given the fact that there is some scientific speculation about hybridization, and what we know about Neaderthal physical traits, this makes a very intriguing theory to me. Of course, its just that, and has no real textual evidence, just as any speculation on this subject is pretty baseless. However, as a theory to introduce into a role playing fictionalization, it has its merits. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Theological Question and The End
Top